As artificial intelligence (AI) continues to play a growing role in souvenir design, concerns about the authenticity of AI-designed souvenirs remain a challenge in the hospitality and tourism industry. This research investigates the impact of AI-designed souvenirs, particularly focusing on art-infused ones, and on the perceived authenticity of souvenirs and purchase intention. Across two preliminary and four experimental studies, the findings demonstrate that AI-designed souvenirs are perceived as less authentic and desirable than human-designed ones. However, strategic interventions, including verification and time scarcity cues, can enhance perceived authenticity and consumer’ willingness to purchase AI-designed souvenirs. This research contributes to the understanding of authenticity in AI-designed products and offers strategies to mitigate consumer’ skepticism of AI-designed products in the hospitality and tourism context.
AnastasiadouC.VetteseS. (2021). Souvenir authenticity in the additive manufacturing age. Annals of Tourism Research, 89, Article 103188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2021.103188
2.
BartonB.ZlatevskaN.OppewalH. (2022). Scarcity tactics in marketing: A meta-analysis of product scarcity effects on consumer purchase intentions. Journal of Retailing, 98(4), 741–758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2022.06.003
CampbellC.PlanggerK.SandsS.KietzmannJ. (2022). Preparing for an era of deepfakes and AI-generated ads: A framework for understanding responses to manipulated advertising. Journal of Advertising, 51(1), 22–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2021.1909515
ChoiD.LeeH. K. (2024). The allure of rarity: Investigating the impact of consumers’ perceived scarcity in AI-designed clothing on purchase intentions. International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/17543266.2024.2425619
7.
CleggM.HofstetterR.de BellisE.SchmittB. H. (2023). Unveiling the mind of the machine. Journal of Consumer Research, 51(2), 342–361. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucad075
8.
CorreiaA.KozakM.KimS. (2019). Investigation of luxury values in shopping tourism using a fuzzy-set approach. Journal of Travel Research, 58(1), 77–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287517741005
9.
DarnallN.JiH.Vázquez-BrustD. A. (2018). Third-party certification, sponsorship, and consumers’ ecolabel use. Journal of Business Ethics, 150, 953–969. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3138-2
10.
DietvorstB. J.SimmonsJ. P.MasseyC. (2015). Algorithm aversion: People erroneously avoid algorithms after seeing them err. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144(1), 114–126. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000033
11.
FanX.LaiA.KehH. T. (2024). Handmade vs. machine-made: The effects of handmade gifts on social relationships. Marketing Letters, 35(3), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-024-09722-w
12.
FuY.LiuX.WangY.ChaoR. F. (2018). How experiential consumption moderates the effects of souvenir authenticity on behavioral intention through perceived value. Tourism Management, 69, 356–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2018.06.023
13.
GoldsmithK.GriskeviciusV.HamiltonR. (2020). Scarcity and consumer decision making: Is scarcity a mindset, a threat, a reference point, or a journey?. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 5(4), 358–364. https://doi.org/10.1086/710531
GrayK.WegnerD. M. (2012). Feeling robots and human zombies: Mind perception and the uncanny valley. Cognition, 125(1), 125–130.
17.
GuptaM.DasG.SeptiantoF.HagtvedtH. (2024). The impact of scarcity cues on purchase likelihood of art-infused products. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 52(2), 470–488. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-023-00945-3
18.
GuptaS. (2025). Gifts Novelty And Souvenir Market Research Report By Product Type (Gifts, Novelty Items, Souvenirs), By Material (Wood, Metal, Ceramic, Textile, Plastic), By Price Range (Low (Under $10), Mid ($10-$50), High (Over $50)), By Occasion (Birthdays, Holidays, Anniversaries, Travel, Corporate Gifting), By Distribution Channel (Online Retailers, Brick-and-mortar Stores, Specialty Gift Shops, Tourist Attractions) and By Regional (North America, Europe, South America, Asia Pacific, Middle East and Africa) - Forecast to 2032 (Report No. MRFR/CR/24722-HCR). Market Research Future. https://www.marketresearchfuture.com/reports/gifts-novelty-and-souvenir-market-26374
19.
HagtvedtH.PatrickV. M. (2008). Art infusion: The influence of visual art on the perception and evaluation of consumer products. Journal of Marketing Research, 45(3), 379–389. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.45.3.379
20.
HarrisL. C.MagrizosS. (2023). “Souvenir shopping is for schmucks!”: Exploring tourists’ deviant behavior through the items they bring back. Journal of Travel Research, 62(2), 345–361. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472875211062615
21.
HayesA. F.MontoyaA. K.RockwoodN. J. (2017). The analysis of mechanisms and their contingencies: PROCESS versus structural equation modeling. Australasian Marketing Journal, 25(1), 76–81.
22.
HmurovicJ.LambertonC.GoldsmithK. (2023). Examining the efficacy of time scarcity marketing promotions in online retail. Journal of Marketing Research, 60(2), 299–328. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222437221118856
23.
HortonC. B.JrWhiteM. W.IyengarS. S. (2023). Bias against AI art can enhance perceptions of human creativity. Scientific Reports, 13(1), Article 19001. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-45202-3
24.
HuangH.LiuS. Q.KandampullyJ.BujisicM. (2020). Consumer responses to scarcity appeals in online booking. Annals of Tourism Research, 80, Article 102800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2019.102800
25.
KimH.SoK. K. F.ShinS.LiJ. (2025a). Artificial intelligence in hospitality and tourism: Insights from industry practices, research literature, and expert opinions. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 49(2), 366–385. https://doi.org/10.1177/10963480241229235
26.
KimH.ChoiS.ShinH. H. (2025b). Artificial intelligence in the kitchen: Can humans be replaced in recipe creation and food production?International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 37(5), 1641–1661. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-04-2024-0549
27.
KimP.DengX.UnnavaR. (2020). In the eye of the beholder: Cross-pollination between art-infused products and retail spaces. Journal of Business Research, 117, 302–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.05.056
28.
KimT.LeeH.KimM. Y.KimS.DuhachekA. (2023). AI increases unethical consumer behavior due to reduced anticipatory guilt. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 51(4), 785–801. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-021-00832-9
29.
KolblŽ.DiamantopoulosA.Arslanagic-KalajdzicM.ZabkarV. (2020). Do brand warmth and brand competence add value to consumers? A stereotyping perspective. Journal of Business Research, 118, 346–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.06.048
30.
LeeG.KimH. Y. (2024). Human vs. AI: The battle for authenticity in fashion design and consumer response. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 77, Article 103690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2023.103690
31.
LeiS. I.NicolauJ. L.XiaoQ.WangD. (2020). The effectiveness of tryvertising in hotels. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 85, Article 102403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2019.102403
32.
LiC.WangY.LvX.LiH. (2021). To buy or not to buy? The effect of time scarcity and travel experience on tourists’ impulse buying. Annals of Tourism Research, 86, Article 103083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2020.103083
33.
LiuX. S.ShiY.XueN. I.ShenH. (2022). The impact of time pressure on impulsive buying: The moderating role of consumption type. Tourism Management, 91, Article 104505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2022.104505
34.
LogkizidouM.BottomleyP.AngellR.EvanschitzkyH. (2019). Why museological merchandise displays enhance luxury product evaluations: An extended art infusion effect. Journal of Retailing, 95(1), 67–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2018.11.001
35.
LongoniC.CianL. (2022). Artificial intelligence in utilitarian vs. hedonic contexts: The “word-of-machine” effect. Journal of Marketing, 86(1), 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022242920957347
36.
LongoniC.BonezziA.MorewedgeC. K. (2019). Resistance to medical artificial intelligence. Journal of Consumer Research, 46(4), 629–650. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucz013
37.
LudeM.PrüglR. (2018). Why the family business brand matters: Brand authenticity and the family firm trust inference. Journal of Business Research, 89, 121–134.
38.
LvX.YuanZ.LuoJ.FuX.ShenH.AiJ.ShenY. (2024). Purchase and protect: Dual effects of tourist souvenir customization. Journal of Travel Research, 64(8), 1843–1863. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472875241269819
39.
MagniF.ParkJ.ChaoM. M. (2024). Humans as creativity gatekeepers: Are we biased against AI creativity?Journal of Business and Psychology, 39(3), 643–656. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-023-09910-x
40.
MassetJ.DecropA. (2021). Meanings of tourist souvenirs: From the holiday experience to everyday life. Journal of Travel Research, 60(4), 718–734. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287520915284
41.
MooreK.BuchmannA.MånssonM.FisherD. (2021). Authenticity in tourism theory and experience. Practically indispensable and theoretically mischievous?Annals of Tourism Research, 89, Article 103208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2021.103208
ParkS.KimS.AhnS. (2023). Understanding the effect of art infusion type on retail product shopping: An attention to the intervening role of customers’ financial wealth. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 70, Article 103154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2022.103154
45.
PelusoA. M.PinoG.AmatulliC.GuidoG. (2017). Luxury advertising and recognizable artworks: New insights on the “art infusion” effect. European Journal of Marketing, 51(11–12), 2192–2206. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-09-2016-0496
46.
PillaiR.SivathanuB.DwivediY. K. (2020). Shopping intention at AI-powered automated retail stores (AIPARS). Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 57, Article 102207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102207
47.
QuachS.SeptiantoF.ThaichonP.MaoW. (2022). Art infusion and functional theories of attitudes toward luxury brands: The mediating role of feelings of self-inauthenticity. Journal of Business Research, 150, 538–552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.06.046
48.
SchibikA.SpearsN.StruttonD. (2024). Investigating the art-infusion effects of vintage products. Psychology & Marketing, 41(11), 2911–2923.
49.
SeoY.SeptiantoF.KoE. (2022). The role of cultural congruence in the art infusion effect. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 32(4), 634–651. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1248
50.
SkandalisA.BanisterE.ByromJ. (2024). Spatial authenticity and extraordinary experiences: Music festivals and the everyday nature of tourism destinations. Journal of Travel Research, 63(2), 357–370. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472875231159054
51.
ShinH. H.ChoiS.KimH. (2025). Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Human Resource Management (HRM): A driver of organizational dehumanization and negative employee reactions. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 131, Article 104230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2025.104230
52.
SoukhathammavongB.ParkE. (2019). The authentic souvenir: What does it mean to souvenir suppliers in the heritage destination?. Tourism Management, 72, 105–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2025.104230
53.
SrinivasanR.Sarial-AbiG. (2021). When algorithms fail: Consumers’ responses to brand harm crises caused by algorithm errors. Journal of Marketing, 85(5), 74–91.
54.
SthapitE. (2018). The more the merrier: Souvenir shopping, the absence of choice overload and preferred attributes. Tourism Management Perspectives, 26, 126–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2017.10.001
55.
SuL.LaiZ.HuangY. (2024). How do tourism souvenir purchasing channels impact tourists’ intention to purchase? The moderating role of souvenir authenticity. Journal of Travel Research, 63(6), 1527–1548. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472875231195062
56.
SullivanY. W.Fosso WambaS. (2022). Moral judgments in the age of artificial intelligence. Journal of Business Ethics, 178(4), 917–943. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05053-w
SwansonK. K.TimothyD. J. (2012). Souvenirs: Icons of meaning, commercialization and commoditization. Tourism management, 33(3), 489–499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2011.10.007
59.
TorabianP.AraiS. M. (2016). Tourist perceptions of souvenir authenticity: An exploration of selective tourist blogs. Current Issues in Tourism, 19(7), 697–712. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2013.820259
60.
Vega-VázquezM.Castellanos-VerdugoM.Oviedo-GarcíaM. Á. (2017). Shopping value, tourist satisfaction and positive word of mouth: The mediating role of souvenir shopping satisfaction. Current Issues in Tourism, 20(13), 1413–1430. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2014.996122
61.
WaltersG.HuckL.RobinsonR. N.StettlerJ. (2021). Commercial hospitality in tourism: A global comparison of what culturally matters. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 95, Article 102939. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2021.102939
62.
WangY.JiangJ.GongX.WangJ. (2023). Simple= Authentic: The effect of visually simple package design on perceived brand authenticity and brand choice. Journal of Business Research, 166, 114078.
63.
WangM.QiuS.FangY. (2024). Evolutionary Perspective on Tourists’ Conformity to the Minority: The Effect of Mating Motive. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 49(7), 1361–1372. https://doi.org/10.1177/10963480241288126
64.
XieZ.YuY.ZhangJ.ChenM. (2022). The searching artificial intelligence: Consumers show less aversion to algorithm-recommended search product. Psychology & Marketing, 39(10), 1902–1919. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21706
65.
XuL.MehtaR. (2022). Technology devalues luxury? Exploring consumer responses to AI-designed luxury products. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 50(6), 1135–1152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-022-00854-x
66.
ZhangY.TukM. A.KlesseA. K. (2024). Giving AI a human touch: Highlighting human input increases the perceived helpfulness of advice from AI coaches. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 9(3), 344–356. https://doi.org/10.1086/730710
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
