Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Deforestation is an environmental stressor that dramatically threatens biodiversity while having adverse, deep-rooted, socioeconomic impacts. Interventions to address deforestation require considerable long-term investments; therefore, assessing their impact is crucial. The UN Convention on Biological Diversity encourages establishing protected areas (PAs) as a strategy to conserve biodiversity, secure ecosystem services, support local livelihoods, and reduce climate change impacts. The Global Environment Facility (GEF) has supported the conservation and management of PAs, yet site accessibility and data availability present challenges in assessing PAs using traditional evaluation methods. We present a novel application of satellite Earth observations for evaluating the effectiveness and impact of PAs as a deforestation mitigation strategy. Geospatial analysis and ecological forecasting methodologies provide an efficient way to quantify land cover change, estimate above ground carbon stock, and evaluate ecosystem services provided by the PAs ex ante. We demonstrate the value of a geospatial approach through the evaluation of GEF-supported PAs in Kenya.

Keywords

remote sensing monitoring deforestation land cover change protected areas mixed methods global environment facility NASA Develop

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bernoux

Branca

Carro

Lipper

Smith

Bockel

(2010). Ex-ante greenhouse gas balance of agriculture and forestry development programs. Scientia Agricola, 67(1), 31–40.

Betts

M. G.

Wolf

Ripple

W. J.

Phalan

Millers

K. A.

Duarte

Butchart

S. H. M.

Levi

(2017). Global forest loss disproportionately erodes biodiversity in intact landscapes. Nature, 547(7664), 441–444.

Brieman

(2001). Random forests. Machine Learning , 45, 5–32. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324

Brooks

T. M.

Mittermeier

R. A.

Mittermeier

C. G.

Da Fonseca

G. A.

Rylands

A. B.

Konstant

W. R.

Flick

Pilgrim

Oldfield

Magin

Hilton-Taylor

(2002). Habitat loss and extinction in the hotspots of biodiversity. Conservation Biology, 16(4), 909–923.

Buchhorn

Smets

Bertels

Lesiv

Tsendbazar

N. E.

Masiliunas

Herold

Fritz

(2019). Copernicus global land service: Land cover 100 m, collection 2, epoch 2015, Africa demo (Version V2.1.1) [Data set]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3518056

Campbell

J. B.

Wynne

R. H.

(2014). Change detection. In Introduction to Remote Sensing (pp. 445–465). Guilford Press.

Coppin

Jonckheere

Nackaerts

Muys

Lambin

(2004). Review Article Digital change detection methods in ecosystem monitoring: A review. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 25(9), 1565–1596. https://doi.org/10.1080/0143116031000101675

Colgan

M. S.

Asner

G. P.

Levick

S. R.

Martin

R. E.

Chadwick

O. A.

(2012). Topo-edaphic controls over woody plant biomass in South African savannas. Biogeosciences Discussions, 9(1), 957–987.

Convention on Biological Diversity. (2012). Target 11—Technical rationale extended. Strategic plan for biodiversity 2011-2020. https://www.cbd.int/sp/targets/rationale/target-11/

10.

Eastman

J. R.

(2015). TerrSet: Geospatial monitoring and modeling software. Clark Labs, Clark University.

11.

Eggleston

H. S.

Buendia

Miwa

Ngara

Tanabe

. (2006). IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. Institute for Global Environmental Strategies, Hayama, Japan, 2, 48–56.

12.

Food and Agriculture Organization. (2016). State of the world’s forests: 2016. http://www.fao.org/3/a-i5850e.pdf

13.

Foody

G. M.

(2003). Remote sensing of tropical forest environments: Towards the monitoring of environmental resources for sustainable development. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 24(20), 4035–4046. https://doi.org/10.1080/0143116031000103853

14.

Gichuki

F. N.

(1999). Threats and opportunities for mountain area development in Kenya. Ambio, 28(5), 430–435.

15.

Glenday

(2005). Preliminary assessment of carbon storage & the potential for forestry based carbon offset projects in the Arabuko-Sokoke forest [Unpublished Report to Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund]. Retrieved November 17, 2016, from http://www.cepf.net/Documents/Final.ASFreport.pdf

16.

Global Environment Facility. (2003). Lewa wildlife conservancy terminal evaluation report. Kenya. https://www.thegef.org/sites/default/files/project_documents/18%2520Kenya%2520-%2520LEWA%2520Output0review0October02003.pdf

17.

Global Environment Facility. (2012). Terminal evaluation of IFAD-GEF Project ID 1848 “Mount Kenya East Pilot project for natural resource management.” Retrieved February 8, 2017, from https://www.thegef.org/sites/default/files/project_documents/1848_IFAD_TE_Kenya%25202012_0.pdf

18.

Gorelick

Hancher

Dixon

Ilyushchenko

Thau

Moore

(2017). Google Earth Engine: Planetary-scale geospatial analysis for everyone. Remote Sensing of Environment , 202, 18–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.06.031

19.

Hayes

(2006). Parks, people, and forest protection: An institutional assessment of the effectiveness of Protected Areas. World Development, 34(12), 2064–2075.

20.

Hijmans

R. J.

Cameron

S. E.

Parra

J. L.

Jones

P. G.

Jarvis

(2005). Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. International Journal of Climatology, 25(15), 1965–1978.

21.

Hills

Mwangi

(2012). The Improved conservation and governance for Kenya coastal forest protected area system project terminal evaluation report (p. 185). Kenya. UNDP Kenya and WWF Kenya Country Office.

22.

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2013). Annex 1: Atlas of Global and Regional Climate Projections. In van Oldenborgh

G. J.

Collins

Arblaster

Christensen

Marotzke

Power

Rummukainen

Zhou

, et al. (Eds.), Climate change 2013: The physical science basis: Contribution of working group I to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press.

23.

Johansen

Phinn

Taylor

(2015). Mapping woody vegetation clearing in Queensland, Australia from Landsat imagery using the Google Earth Engine. Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment, 1, 36–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsase.2015.06.002

24.

Jones

Ratsimba

Ravaoarinorotsihoarana

Cripps

Bey

(2014). Ecological variability and carbon stock estimates of mangrove ecosystems in northwestern Madagascar. Forests, 5(1), 177–205.

25.

Lee

Gong

Ryu

(2015). Characteristics of Landsat 8 OLI-derived NDVI by comparison with multiple satellite sensors and in-situ observations. Remote Sensing of Environment, 164, 298–313.

26.

Kenyan Forest Service. (2010). Revised REDD readiness preparation proposal. Kenyan Forest Service. Retrieved September 26, 2016, from http://www.kenyaforestservice.org/documents/redd/Kenyas%20REDD+%20Readiness%20Preparation%20Proposal%20(RPP).pdf

27.

Kogo

B. K.

Kumar

Koech

(2019). Forest cover dynamics and underlying driving forces affecting ecosystem services in Western Kenya. Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment, 14, 75–83.

28.

Lambin

E. F.

Linderman

(2006). Time series of remote sensing data for land change science. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing , 44(7), 1926–1928. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2006.872932

29.

Lawrence

R. L.

Wright

(2001). Rule-based classification systems using classification and regression tree analysis. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 67, 1137–1142.

30.

Linard

Gilbert

Snow

R. W.

Noor

A. M.

Tatem

A. J.

(2012). Population distribution, settlement patterns and accessibility across Africa in 2010. PLOS ONE, 7(2), e31743.

31.

Lung

Espira

(2015). The influence of stand variables and human use on biomass and carbon stocks of a transitional African forest: Implications for forest carbon projects. Forest Ecology and Management, 351, 36–46.

32.

Mandela

H. K.

Tsingalia

M. H.

Gikungu

Lwande

W. M.

(2018). Distance effects on diversity and abundance of the flower visitors of Ocimum kilimandscharicum in the Kakamega forest ecosystem. International Journal of Biodiversity, 2018, 1–7.

33.

Mascia

M. B.

Pailler

Thieme

M. L.

Rowe

Bottrill

M. C.

Danielsen

Geldmann

Naidoo

Pullin

A. S.

Burgess

N. D.

(2014). Commonalities and complementarities among approaches to conservation monitoring and evaluation. Biological Conservation, 169, 258–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2013.11.017

34.

Mbora

Wieczkowski

Munene

(2009). Links between habitat degradation, and social group size, ranging, fecundity, and parasite prevalence in the Tana River Mangabey (Cercocebus galeritus). American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 140(3), 562–571.

35.

Ministry of Environment and Forest. (2018). Taskforce report on forest resources management and logging activities in Kenya. http://www.environment.go.ke/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/Forest-Report.pdf

36.

NASA JPL. (2013). NASA shuttle radar topography mission global 1 arc second [Data set]. NASA EOSDIS Land Processes DAAC. https://doi.org/10.5067/MEaSUREs/SRTM/SRTMGL1.003

37.

Newbold

Hudson

L. N.

Arnell

A. P.

Contu

DePalma

Ferrier

Hill

S. L. L.

Hoskins

A. J.

Lysenko

Phillips

H. R. P.

Burton

V. J.

Chng

C. W. T.

Emerson

Gao

Pask-Hale

Hutton

Jung

Sanchez-Ortiz

Simmons

B. I.…

Purvis

(2016). Has land use pushed terrestrial biodiversity beyond the planetary boundary? A global assessment. Science , 353(6296), 288–291. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf2201

38.

Omwega

Norgbey

(2004). Lake Baringo community-based land and water management project evaluation report. United Nations Environment Programme.

39.

OpenStreetMap Contributors. (2016). OpenStreetMap [Data file from October 10, 2016]. https://planet.openstreetmap.org

40.

Ouyang

Zheng

Xiao

Polasky

Liu

Wang

Zhang

Xiao

Rao

Jiang

Wang

Yang

Gong

Zeng

Yang

Daily

G. C.

(2016). Improvements in ecosystem services from investments in natural capital. Science, 352(6292), 1455–1459.

41.

Penman

Gytarsky

Hiraishi

Krug

Kruger

Pipatti

Buendia

Miwa

Ngara

Tanabe

Wagner

(2003). Good practice guidance for land use, land-use change and forestry. Retrieved September 14, 2016, from https://www.cabdirect.org/cabdirect/abstract/20083162304

42.

Renger

Cimetta

Pettygrove

Rogan

(2002). Geographic Information Systems (GIS) as an evaluation tool. American Journal of Evaluation , 23(4), 469–479. https://doi.org/10.1177/109821400202300407

43.

Robinson

T. P.

Wint

G. R. W.

Conchedda

Boeckel

T. P. V.

Ercoli

Palamara

Cinardi

D’Aietti

Hay

S. I.

Gilbert

, (2014). Mapping the global distribution of livestock. PLOS ONE, 9(5), e96084.

44.

Roy

D. P.

Kovalskyy

Zhang

H. K.

Vermote

E. F.

Yan

Kumar

S. S.

Egorov

(2016). Characterization of Landsat-7 to Landsat-8 reflective wavelength and normalized difference vegetation index continuity. Remote Sensing of Environment, 185, 57–70.

45.

Sangermano

Eastman

J. R.

Zhu

(2010). Similarity weighted instance-based learning for the generation of transition potentials in land use change modeling. Transactions in GIS, 14(5), 569–580.

46.

Sangermano

Toledano

Eastman

J. R.

(2012). Land cover change in the Bolivian Amazon and its implications for REDD+ and endemic biodiversity. Landscape Ecology, 27(4), 571–584. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-012-9710-y

47.

Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity. (2010). Global biodiversity outlook 3. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity.

48.

Teng

Xiang

Huang

Jiang

Meng

Fuhrmann

J. J.

(2016). Spatial distribution and variability of carbon storage in different sympodial bamboo species in China. Journal of Environmental Management, 168, 46–52.

49.

Tucker

C. J.

(1979). Red and photographic infrared linear combinations for monitoring vegetation. Remote Sensing of Environment, 8(2), 127–150.

50.

U.S. Geological Survey Earth Resources Observation and Science Center. (1982). Landsat 4-5 thematic mapper (TM) level-1 data products [Data set]. https://doi.org/10.5066/F7N015TQ

51.

U.S. Geological Survey Earth Resources Observation and Science Center. (1999). Landsat 7 enhanced thematic mapper plus (ETM+) level-1 data products [Data set]. https://doi.org/10.5066/F7WH2P8G

52.

U.S. Geological Survey Earth Resources Observation and Science Center. (2013). Landsat 8 OLI (Operational land imager) and TIRS (Thermal infrared sensor) level-1 data products [Data set]. https://doi.org/10.5066/F71835S6

53.

UN General Assembly. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development, A/RES/70/1. https://www.refworld.org/docid/57b6e3e44.html

54.

Vieilledent

Vaudry

Andriamanohisoa

S. F. D.

Rakotonarivo

O. S.

Randrianasolo

H. Z.

Razafindrabe

H. N.

Rakotoarivony

C. B.

Ebeling

Rasamoelina

(2012). A universal approach to estimate biomass and carbon stock in tropical forests using generic allometric models. Ecological Applications, 22(2), 572–583.

55.

Woodcock

C. E.

Strahler

A. H.

(1987). The factor of scale in remote sensing. Remote Sensing of Environment, 21(3), 311–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(87)90015-0

56.

The World Bank. (2010). Western Kenya integrated ecosystem management project implementation completion and results report (No. ICR00001533). Kenya.

57.

Yang

C. P.

(2002). Using a time series of satellite imagery to detect land use and land cover changes in the Atlanta, Georgia metropolitan area. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 23(9), 1775–1798. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160110075802

58.

Zhu

Woodcock

C. E.

(2012). Object-based cloud and cloud shadow detection in Landsat imagery. Remote Sensing of Environment, 118, 83–94.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.11 MB