This paper unpacks our efforts as external evaluators to work toward decolonizing our evaluation practice. Undertaking this writing exercise as a form of reflective practice demonstrated that decolonization is much more complex than simply translating materials, organizing locals to collect data, and building participants’ capacity around Western modalities. While this complexity is clear in the decolonization literature, practice-based examples that depict barriers and thought processes are rarely presented. Through this paper, we deconstruct our deeply held beliefs around what constitutes good evaluation to assess the effectiveness of our decolonizing approach. Through sharing our critical consciousness-raising dialoguing, this paper reports our progress thus far and provides information and provocations to support others attempting to decolonize their practice.
BrownM.Di LalloS. (2020). Talking circles: A culturally responsive evaluation practice. American Journal of Evaluation, 41(3), 367–383. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214019899164
5.
CavinoH. M. (2013). Across the colonial divide: Conversations about evaluation in indigenous contexts. American Journal of Evaluation, 34(3), 339–355. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214013489338
6.
ChildsP.WilliamsR. J. P. (1997). An introduction to post-colonial theory. Routledge.
7.
ChilisaB. (2019). Indigenous research methodologies (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
8.
ChilisaB.MajorT.GaotlhobogweM.MokgolodiH. (2016). Decolonizing and indigenizing evaluation practice in Africa: Toward African relational evaluation approaches. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 30(3), 313–328. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjpe.30.3.05
9.
ChouinardJ. (2016). Introduction: Decolonizing international development evaluation. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 30(3), 237–247. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjpe.30.3.01
10.
CloeteF.AuriacombeC. (2019). Revisiting decoloniality for more effective research and evaluation. African Evaluation Journal, 7(1), a363. https://doi.org/10.4102/aej.v7i1.363
11.
DurokifaA. A.IjeomaE. C. (2018). Neo-colonialism and millennium development goals (MDGs) in Africa: A blend of an old wine in a new bottle. African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development, 10(3), 355–366. https://doi.org/10.1080/20421338.2018.1463654
12.
EliasA.MansouriF.ParadiesY. (2021). Racism in Australia today. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan.
13.
EscobarA. (1995). Encountering development: The making and unmaking of the Third World. Princeton University Press.
14.
EstradaV. (2005). The tree of life as a research methodology. The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 34(12), 44–52. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1326011100003951
15.
EybenR.GuijtI.RocheC.ShuttC. (Eds.). (2015). Politics of evidence and results in international development: Playing the game to change the rules?. Rugby, Warwickshire: Practical Action Publishing.
16.
FanonF. (2002[1961]). The wretched of the earth. Penguin.
17.
FettermanD. (2015). Empowerment evaluation and action research: A convergence of values, principles, and purpose. In BradburyH. (Ed.), The Sage handbook of action research (3rd ed., pp. 83–89). Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473921290.
18.
FettermanD.WandersmanA. (Eds.). (2005). Empowerment evaluation principles in practice. Guilford Press.
19.
FoucaultM. (1977). The archaeology of knowledge. Tavistock.
20.
GrandeS. (2008). Red pedagogy: The un-methodology. In DenzinN.LincolnY.Tuhiwai SmithL. (Eds.), Handbook of critical and indigenous methodologies (pp. 233–254). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
21.
HopsonR.KirkhartK.BledsloeK. (2012). Decolonizing evaluation in a developing world: Implications and cautions for equity-focussed evaluation. In SegoneM. (Ed.), Evaluation for equitable development results (pp. 59–82). UNICEF.
22.
KawakamiA.AtonK.CramF.LaiM.PorimaL., (2007). Improving the practice of evaluation through indigenous values and methods: Decolonizing evaluation practice—returning the gaze from Hawai’i and Aotearoa. In BrandonP.SmithP. (Eds.), Fundamental issues in evaluation (pp. 219–242). New York: Guilford Press.
23.
KellyL. (2019). What’s the point? Program evaluation in small community development NGOs. Deakin University.
24.
KellyL. (2020). Baseline evaluation of the community development education project in Rakhine State, Myanmar (not publicly available).
25.
KellyL. (2021a). Evaluation in small development non-profits: Deadends, victories, and alternative routes. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58979-0.
26.
KellyL. (2021b). A clash of values: Deep-rooted discord between empowering, participatory, community-driven development and results-focused, evidence-based evaluation. Community Development, 52(5), 607–623. https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330.2021.1936101
27.
KellyL.RogersA. (2022). Internal evaluation in non-profit organisations: Practitioner perspectives on theory, research, and practice. Routledge.
28.
KothariU. (2006). From colonialism to development: Reflections of former colonial officers. Commonwealth & Comparative Politics, 44(1), 118–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/14662040600624502
29.
KovachM. (2010). Indigenous methodologies; Characteristics, conversations, and contexts. University of Toronto Press.
30.
LaFranceJ.NicholsR. (2009). Indigenous evaluation framework: Telling our story in our place and time. American Indian Higher Education Consortium (AIHEC).
31.
LaFranceJ.NicholsR. (2010). Reframing evaluation: Defining an indigenous evaluation framework. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 23(2), 13–31.
32.
LangdonJ. (2013). Decolonising development studies: Reflections on critical pedagogies in action. Canadian Journal of Development Studies, 34(3), 384–399. https://doi.org/10.1080/02255189.2013.825205
33.
NandyA. (1989). The intimate enemy: Loss and recovery of self under colonialism. Oxford University Press.
NgũgĩW. T. (1986). Decolonising the mind: The politics of language in African literature. James Currey.
36.
ShizhaE.KariwoM. (2011). Impact of colonialism on education. In ShizhaE.KariwoM. (Eds.), Education and development in Zimbabwe (pp. 13–26). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-606-9_2.
37.
TuckE.YangK.W. (2012). Decolonization is not a metaphor. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, 1(1), 1–40.
38.
Tuhiwai SmithL. (2021). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples (3rd ed.). Bloomsbury.
Waapalaneexkweew (N. Bowman-Farrell). (2018). Looking backward but moving forward: Honoring the sacred and asserting the sovereign in indigenous evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation, 39(4), 543–568. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214018790412
41.
WandersmanA.Snell-JohnsJ. (2005). Empowerment evaluation: Clarity, dialogue, and growth. American Journal of Evaluation, 26(3), 421–428. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214005278774
42.
WareA. (2018). Awareness-raising as community development: Theory, case study and innovation in Myanmar. In KennyS.PhillipsR.McGrathB. (Eds.), The routledge handbook of community development: Perspectives from around the globe (pp. 115–130). Routledge.
WareV.WareA.KellyL. (2022). Everyday peace: After ethnic cleansing in Myanmar’s Rohingya conflict. In EversleyJ.GormallyS.KilmurrayA. (Eds.), Peacebuilding, conflict and community development (pp. 191–208). Policy Press.
45.
WilsonS. (2008). Research is ceremony: Indigenous research methods. Halifax, Nova Scotia: Fernwood.
