The study examined international and home students’ perceptions of intercultural collaborative learning in an English as a medium of instruction (EMI) environment in a Chinese university. Drawing on data from in-depth interviews, the findings showed that international students held a positive view, reporting gains from the cultural, subject knowledge and language learning dimensions but also hurdles which impeded intercultural communication and content learning in the EMI curriculum. The Chinese students were less positive, viewing such a mode of learning somewhat as a ‘burden’ due primarily to the differences in their and international students’ academic goals and expectations. In response to the negative experiences, the Chinese students demonstrated resilience and ingenuity in devising strategies for achieving their own academic goals. This article concludes with practical implications for EMI teachers and curriculum designers regarding how to improve EMI instruction and intercultural learning in higher education.
AlexanderR. (2018). Developing dialogic teaching: Genesis, process, trial. Research Papers in Education, 33, 561–598.
2.
AlhassanA. (2019). EFL postgraduate students’ learning needs on English-medium business programmes: An exploratory study. Language Teaching Research, 25, 798–816.
3.
AnJ.MacaroE.ChildsA. (2021). Classroom interaction in EMI high schools: Do teachers who are native speakers of English make a difference?System, 98, 102482.
4.
BarkleyE.F.CrossK.P.MajorC.H. (2014). Collaborative learning techniques: A handbook for college faculty. John Wiley.
5.
CallaryB.RathwellS.YoungB.W. (2015). Insights on the process of using interpretive phenomenological analysis in a sport coaching research project. Qualitative Report, 20, 63–75.
6.
CilesizS. (2011). A phenomenological approach to experiences with technology: Current state, promise, and future directions for research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59, 487–510.
7.
CottonD.GeorgeR.JoynerM. (2013). Interaction and influence in culturally mixed groups. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 50, 272–283.
8.
CreswellJ.W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches. 2nd edition.Sage.
9.
DeardenJ. (2015). English as a medium of instruction: A growing global phenomenon. British Council.
10.
de HeiM.TabacaruC.SjoerE.RippeR.WalenkampJ. (2019). Developing intercultural competence through collaborative learning in international higher education. Journal of Studies in International Education, 24, 190–211.
11.
EvnitskayaN.MortonT. (2011). Knowledge construction, meaning-making and interaction in CLIL science classroom communities of practice. Language and Education, 25, 109–127.
12.
FangF.BakerW. (2018). ‘A more inclusive mind towards the world’: English language teaching and study abroad in China from intercultural citizenship and English as a lingua franca perspectives. Language Teaching Research, 22, 608–624.
13.
GodY.T.ZhangH. (2018). Acknowledging the legitimacy of local practices: A study of communication challenges between Chinese and Australian university students. The International Education Journal: Comparative Perspectives, 17, 108–122.
14.
GokhaleA.A. (2012). Collaborative learning and critical thinking. In SeelN.M. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning (pp. 634–636). Springer.
15.
GuQ. (2009). Maturity and interculturality: Chinese students’ experiences in UK higher education. European Journal of Education, 44, 37–52.
16.
HennebryM.FordyceK. (2018). Cooperative learning on an international masters. Higher Education Research & Development, 37, 270–284.
17.
HuG.LiL.LeiJ. (2014). English-medium instruction at a Chinese University: Rhetoric and reality. Language Policy, 13, 21–40.
18.
IppolitoK. (2007). Promoting intercultural learning in a multicultural university: Ideals and realities. Teaching in Higher Education, 12, 749–763.
19.
JiangL.ZhangL.J.MayS. (2019). Implementing English-medium instruction (EMI) in China: teachers’ practices and perceptions, and students’ learning motivation and needs. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 22, 107–119.
20.
LarbiF.O.FuW. (2017). Practices and challenges of internationalization of higher education in China; international students’ perspective: A case study of Beijing Normal University. International Journal of Comparative Education and Development, 19, 78–96.
21.
LiC.RuanZ. (2015). Changes in beliefs about language learning among Chinese EAP learners in an EMI context in mainland China: A socio-cultural perspective. System, 55, 43–52.
22.
LoY.Y.MacaroE. (2012). The medium of instruction and classroom interaction: Evidence from Hong Kong secondary schools. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 15, 29–52.
23.
LowrieT. (2011). ‘If this was real’: Tensions between using genuine artefacts and collaborative learning in mathematics tasks. Research in Mathematics Education, 13, 1–16.
24.
MacaroE. (2019). Exploring the role of language in English medium instruction. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 23, 263–276.
25.
MacaroE.HanS. (2020). English medium instruction in China’s higher education: Teachers’ perspectives of competencies, certification and professional development. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 41, 219–231.
26.
MacaroE.CurleS.PunJ.AnJ.DeardenJ. (2018). A systematic review of English medium instruction in higher education. Language Teaching, 51, 36–76.
27.
MartinA.MarshH. (2006). Academic resilience and its psychological and educational correlates: A construct validity approach. Psychology in the Schools, 43, 267–281.
28.
MercerN.DawesL. (2014). The study of talk between teachers and students, from the 1970s until the 2010s. Oxford Review of Education, 40, 430–445.
29.
MoustakasC. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Sage.
30.
Ministry of Education, The People’s Republic of China. (2018). Brief report on Chinese overseas students and international students in China 2017. Ministry of Education. Available at: http://en.moe.gov.cn/documents/reports/201901/t20190115_367019.html (accessed September 2021).
31.
MunezaneY. (2019). A new model of intercultural communicative competence: Bridging language classrooms and intercultural communicative contexts. Studies in Higher Education, 46, 1664–1681.
32.
PattonM.Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Sage.
33.
PoortI.JansenE.HofmanA. (2019). Intercultural group work in higher education: Costs and benefits from an expectancy-value theory perspective. International Journal of Educational Research, 93, 218–231.
34.
RyanJ. (2011). Teaching and learning for international students: towards a transcultural approach. Teachers and Teaching, 17, 631–648.
35.
SaddlerY.SundinE.C. (2020). Mature students’ journey into higher education in the UK: An interpretative phenomenological analysis. Higher Education Research & Development, 39, 332–345.
36.
SatoT.HodgeS. (2015). Japanese exchange students’ academic and social struggles at an American university. Journal of International Students, 5, 208–227.
SoruçA.GriffithsC. (2018). English as a medium of instruction: students’ strategies. ELT Journal, 72, 38–48.
39.
StarksH.Brown TrinidadS. (2007). Choose your method: A comparison of phenomenology, discourse analysis, and grounded theory. Qualitative Health Research, 17, 1372–1380.
40.
SunP.YuanR. (2018). Understanding collaborative language learning in novice-level foreign language classrooms: perceptions of teachers and students. Interactive Learning Environments, 26, 189–205.
41.
TsangA.YuanR. (2021). Examining home and international students’ awareness of attitudes towards and participation in intercultural activities on campus. Journal of Studies in International Education. Epub ahead of print 11February2021. DOI: 10.1177/1028315321990741.
42.
Udvari-SolnerA. (2012). Collaborative learning. In SeelN.M. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the sciences of learning (pp. 631–634). Springer.
43.
Van ManenM. (2017). Phenomenology in its original sense. Qualitative Health Research, 27, 810–825.
44.
VoletS.E.AngG. (2012). Culturally mixed groups on international campuses: An opportunity for inter-cultural learning. Higher Education Research & Development, 31, 21–37.
45.
VygotskyL. (1978). Mind in society. Harvard University Press.
46.
WalkerR.C.CardonP.W.AritzJ. (2018). Enhancing global virtual small group communication skills. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 47, 421–433.
47.
WannagatU. (2007). Learning through L2-content and language integrated learning (CLIL) and English as medium of instruction (EMI). International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 10, 663–682.
48.
YangR. (2014). China’s strategy for the internationalization of higher education: An overview. Frontiers of Education in China, 9, 151–162.
49.
YipD.Y.CoyleD.TsangW.K. (2007). Evaluation of the effects of the medium of instruction on science learning of Hong Kong secondary students: Instructional activities in science lessons. Education Journal, 35, 77–107.
50.
YuS.WangY.JiangL.WangB. (2020). Coping with EMI (English as a medium of instruction): Mainland China students’ strategies at a university in Macau. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 58, 462–472.
51.
YuanR. (2020). Promoting EMI teacher development in EFL higher education contexts: A teacher educator’s reflections. RELC Journal, 51, 309–317.
52.
YuanR.LiS.YuB. (2019). Neither ‘local’ nor ‘global’: Chinese university students’ identity paradoxes in the internationalization of higher education. Higher Education, 77, 963–978.
