The importance of socioeconomic status (SES) in foreign language learning has received increasing attention. However, previous research mainly examined the direct link between SES and foreign language learning, and few explored what might mitigate this link, especially in collectivistic culture. Based on social capital theory and the attachment theory, this study explored the moderating role of teacher–student relationships (TSRs) in the link between SES and English learning in China. Data were collected from 1,181 grade 8 and 300 grade 11 students in China using self-reported SES questionnaire, TSRs scale, and English achievement test. The results show that TSRs negatively moderated the association between SES and English performance of Chinese students both in grade 8 and grade 11, but the moderating effect of TSRs was slightly greater in grade 11. That is, supportive TSRs mitigated the effects of SES on foreign language learning, especially for senior secondary students. This finding sheds light on foreign language teaching and learning in China and other countries with similar sociocultural context theoretically and practically.
AbediJ.LeonS.MirochaJ. (2003). Impact of student language background on content-based performance: Analyses of extant data. Center for the study of Evaluation Report 603. UCLA.
2.
AdlerP.S.KwonS.-W. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27, 17–40.
3.
AikensL.S.WestS.G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interaction. Sage.
4.
AlzubaidiE.AldridgeJ.M.KhineM.S. (2016). Learning English as a second language at the university level in Jordan: Motivation, self-regulation and learning environment perceptions. Learning Environments Research, 19, 133–152.
5.
BerginC.BerginD. (2009). Attachment in the classroom. Educational Psychology Review, 21, 141–170.
6.
BlockD. (2014). Social class in applied linguistics. Routledge.
7.
BosmanR.J.RoordaD.L.van der VeenI.KoomenH.M. (2018). Teacher–student relationship quality from kindergarten to sixth grade and students’ school adjustment: A person-centered approach. Journal of School Psychology, 68, 177–194.
8.
BrethertonI. (1985). Attachment theory: Retrospect and prospect. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 50, 3–35.
9.
BrumbergH.L.ShahS.I. (2015). Born early and born poor: An eco-bio-developmental model for poverty and preterm birth. Journal of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine, 8, 179–187.
10.
ButlerY.G.LeV.-N. (2018). A longitudinal investigation of parental social-economic status (SES) and young students’ learning of English as a foreign language. System, 73, 4–15.
11.
ChenX.FrenchD.C. (2008). Children’s social competence in cultural context. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 591–616.
12.
ChenM.ZeeM.KoomenH.M.RoordaD.L. (2019). Understanding cross-cultural differences in affective teacher–student relationships: A comparison between Dutch and Chinese primary school teachers and students. Journal of School Psychology, 76, 89–106.
13.
ColemanJ.S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. The American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95–120.
14.
CookC.R.CocoS.ZhangY., et al. (2018). Cultivating positive teacher–student relationships: Preliminary evaluation of the establish-maintain-restore (EMR) method. School Psychology Review, 47, 226–243.
15.
CroningerR.G.LeeV.E. (2001). Social capital and dropping out of high school: Benefits to at-risk students of teachers’ support and guidance. Teachers College Record, 103, 548–581.
16.
CulpeperJ.KanQ. (2020). Communicative styles, rapport, and student engagement: An online peer mentoring scheme. Applied Linguistics, 41, 756–786.
17.
DeciE.L.RyanR.M. (1985). The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 19, 109–134.
18.
Delos ReyesR.D.G.TorioV.A.G. (2021). The relationship of expert teacher–learner rapport and learner autonomy in the CVIF-dynamic learning program. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 30, 471–481.
19.
DemirE.K. (2021). The role of social capital for teacher professional learning and student achievement: A systematic literature review. Educational Research Review, 33, 100391.
20.
DerakhshanA.DolińskiD.ZhalehK.EnayatM.J.FathiJ. (2022). A mixed-methods cross-cultural study of teacher care and teacher–student rapport in Iranian and Polish University students’ engagement in pursuing academic goals in an L2 context. System, 106, 102790.
21.
DewaeleJ.M.WitneyJ.SaitoK.DewaeleL. (2018). Foreign language enjoyment and anxiety: The effect of teacher and learner variables. Language Teaching Research, 22, 676–697.
22.
ElbroC.DaugaardH.T.GellertA.S. (2012). Dyslexia in a second language? A dynamic test of reading acquisition may provide a fair answer. Annals of Dyslexia, 62, 172–185.
23.
EllisR. (2008). The study of second language acquisition. 2nd edition.Oxford University Press.
24.
EngelsM.C.SpiltJ.DeniesK.VerschuerenK. (2021). The role of affective teacher–student relationships in adolescents’ school engagement and achievement trajectories. Learning and Instruction, 75, 101485.
25.
FarahM.J. (2017). The neuroscience of socioeconomic status: Correlates, causes, and consequences. Neuron, 96, 56–71.
26.
FarrellT.S.C. (2015). Reflecting on teacher–student relations in TESOL. ELT Journal, 69, 26–34.
27.
FernaldA.MarchmanV.A.WeislederA. (2013). SES differences in language processing skill and vocabulary are evident at 18 months. Developmental Science, 16, 234–248.
28.
GaoY. (2016). The influence of parental involvement on academic achievement of primary and secondary school students: The moderating effect of family socio-economic status. Educational Measurement and Evaluation, 12, 40–46. (In Chinese.)
29.
GathercoleV.C.M.KennedyI.ThomasE.M. (2016). Socioeconomic level and bilinguals’ performance on language and cognitive measures. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 19, 1057–1078.
30.
GoetzT.BielekeM.GogolK., et al. (2021). Getting along and feeling good: Reciprocal associations between student–teacher relationship quality and students’ emotions. Learning and Instruction, 71, 101349.
31.
GonzalezJ.E.AcostaS.DavisH., et al. (2017). Latino maternal literacy beliefs and practices mediating socioeconomic status and maternal education effects in predicting child receptive vocabulary. Early Education and Development, 28, 78–95.
32.
HamreB.K.PiantaR.C. (2005). Can instructional and emotional support in the first-grade classroom make a difference for children at risk of school failure?Child Development, 76, 949–967.
33.
HardingJ.F.MorrisP.A.HughesD. (2015). The relationship between maternal education and children’s academic outcomes: A theoretical framework. Journal of Marriage and Family, 77, 60–76.
34.
HarwellM.MaedaY.BishopK.XieA. (2017). The surprisingly modest relationship between SES and educational achievement. Journal of Experimental Education, 85, 197–214.
35.
HattieJ. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.
36.
HawJ.Y.KingR.B.TrinidadJ.E.R. (2021). Need supportive teaching is associated with greater reading achievement: What the Philippines can learn from PISA 2018. International Journal of Educational Research, 11, 101864.
37.
HenryA.ThorsenC. (2018). Teacher–student relationships and L2 motivation. The Modern Language Journal, 102, 218–241.
38.
HuangB.ChangY.S.NiuL.ZhiM. (2018). Examining the effects of socio-economic status and language input on adolescent English learners’ speech production outcomes. System, 73, 27–36.
39.
HuangY.T.LeechK.RoweM.L. (2017). Exploring socioeconomic differences in syntactic development through the lens of real-time processing. Cognition, 159, 61–75.
40.
HughesJ.N.CaoQ. (2018). Trajectories of teacher–student warmth and conflict at the transition to middle school: Effects on academic engagement and achievement. Journal of School Psychology, 67, 148–162.
41.
HughesJ.N.WuJ.Y.KwokO.M.VillarrealV.JohnsonA.Y. (2012). Indirect effects of child reports of teacher–student relationship on achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 350–365.
42.
JoeH.-K.HiverP.Al-HoorieA.H. (2017). Classroom social climate, self-determined motivation, willingness to communicate, and achievement: A study of structural relationships in instructed second language settings. Learning and Individual Differences, 53, 133–144.
43.
KennyD.A.KaniskanB.McCoachD.B. (2015). The performance of RMSEA in models with small degrees of freedom. Sociological Methods and Research, 44, 486–507.
44.
KimJ.S.QuinnD.M. (2013). The effects of summer reading on low-income children’s literacy achievement from kindergarten to grade 8: A meta-analysis of classroom and home interventions. Review of Educational Research, 83, 386–431.
45.
KlemA.M.ConnellJ.P. (2004). Relationships matter: Linking teacher support to student engagement and achievement. Journal of School Health, 74, 262–273.
46.
KuhlP.K. (2011). Early language learning and literacy: Neuroscience implications for education. Mind, Brain, and Education, 5, 128–142.
47.
LambM. (2017). The motivational dimension of language teaching. Language Teaching, 50, 301–346.
48.
LeiH.CuiY.ChiuM.M. (2017). The relationship between teacher support and students’ academic emotions: A meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 2288.
49.
LenkeitJ.HartmannA.EhlertA.KniggeM.SpörerN. (2022). Effects of special educational needs and socioeconomic status on academic achievement. Separate or confounded?International Journal of Educational Research, 113, 101957.
50.
LiS.TaoS.JoshiR.M.XuQ. (2018). Second-language reading difficulties among native Chinese-speaking students learning to read English: The roles of native- and second-language skills. Reading Research Quarterly, 53, 423–441.
51.
LiS.XuQ.XiaR. (2020). Relationship between SES and academic achievement of junior high school students in China: The mediating effect of self-concept. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 02513.
52.
LiuH.LiuQ.DuX.LiuJ.SchumackerR.E. (2021). Teacher–student relationship as a protective factor for socioeconomic status, students’ self-efficacy and achievement: A multilevel moderated mediation analysis. Current Psychology. Epub. DOI: 10.1007/s12144-021-01598-7.
53.
LiuJ.PengP.LuoL. (2020). The relation between family socioeconomic status and academic achievement in China: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 32, 49–76.
54.
LurieL.A.HagenM.P.McLaughlinK.A., et al. (2021). Mechanisms linking socioeconomic status and academic achievement in early childhood: Cognitive stimulation and language. Cognitive Development, 58, 101045.
55.
MaL.DuX.LiuJ. (2020). Mediating role of motivation on the effects of teacher–student relationships on foreign language achievement. Porta Linguarum, 1, 129–144.
56.
MaL.LuoH.XiaoL. (2021). Perceived teacher support, self-concept, enjoyment and achievement in reading: A multilevel mediation model based on PISA 2018. Learning and Individual Differences, 85, 101947.
57.
MaL.LiuJ.LiB. (2022). The association between teacher–student relationship and academic achievement: The moderating effect of parental involvement. Psychology in the Schools, 59, 281–296.
58.
MaL.DuX.HauK.TLiuJ. (2018). The association between teacher–student relationship and academic achievement in Chinese EFL context: A serial multiple mediation model. Educational Psychology, 5, 687–707.
59.
MainhardT.OudmanS.HornstraL.BoskerR.J.GoetzT. (2018). Student emotions in class: The relative importance of teachers and their interpersonal relations with students. Learning and Instruction, 53, 109–119.
60.
MartinA.J.CollieR.J. (2019). Teacher–student relationships and students’ engagement in high school: Does the number of negative and positive relationships with teachers matter?Journal of Educational Psychology, 111, 861–876.
61.
McCormickM.P.O’ConnorE.E.HornE.P. (2017). Can teacher–child relationships alter the effects of early socioeconomic status on achievement in middle childhood?Journal of School Psychology, 64, 76–92.
62.
MercerS.GkonouC. (2020). Relationships and good language teachers. In GriffithsC.TajeddinZ. (Eds.), Lessons from good language teachers (pp. 164–174). Cambridge University Press.
63.
MurrayC.GreenbergM.T. (2006). Examining the importance of social relationships and social contexts in the lives of children with high-incidence disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 39, 220–233.
64.
NikolovM. (2009). Early modern foreign language programmes and outcomes: Factors contributing to Hungarian learners’ proficiency. In NikolovM. (Ed.), Early learning of modern foreign languages (pp. 90–107). Multilingual Matters.
65.
O’ConnorE.E.CollinsB.A.SuppleeL. (2012). Behavior problems in late childhood: The roles of early maternal attachment and teacher–child relationship trajectories. Attachment and Human Development, 14, 265–288.
PaceA.LuoR.Hirsh-PasekK.GolinkoffR.M. (2017). Identifying pathways between socioeconomic status and language development. Annual Review of Linguistics, 3, 285–308.
68.
PiantaR.C.HamreB.StuhlmanM. (2003). Relationships between teachers and children. In ReynoldsW.M.MillerG.E. (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Educational psychology: Volume 7 (pp. 199–234). John Wiley.
69.
PishghadamR.DerakhshanA.ZhalehK.Al-ObaydiL.H. (2021). Students’ willingness to attend EFL classes with respect to teachers’ credibility, stroke, and success: A cross-cultural study of Iranian and Iraqi students’ perceptions. Current Psychology. Epub ahead of print 23April2021. DOI: 10.1007/s12144-021-01738-z.
70.
PitzerJ.SkinnerE. (2017). Predictors of changes in students’ motivational resilience over the school year: The roles of teacher support, self-appraisals, and emotional reactivity. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 41, 15–29.
71.
PoonK. (2020). The impact of socioeconomic status on parental factors in promoting academic achievement in Chinese children. International Journal of Educational Development, 75, 102175.
72.
QuinD. (2017). Longitudinal and contextual associations between teacher–student relationships and student engagement: A systematic review. Review of Educational Research, 87, 345–387.
73.
RakeshD.WhittleS. (2021). Socioeconomic status and the developing brain: A systematic review of neuroimaging findings in youth. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 130, 379–407.
74.
RoordaD.L.JakS.ZeeM.OortF.J.KoomenH.M.Y. (2017). Affective teacher–student relationships and students’ engagement and achievement: A meta-analytic update and test of the mediating role of engagement. School Psychology Review, 46, 239–261.
75.
RuzekE.A.HafenC.A.AllenJ.P., et al. (2016). How teacher emotional support motivates students: The mediating roles of perceived peer relatedness, autonomy support, and competence. Learning and Instruction, 42, 95–103.
76.
RymesB. (2010). Classroom discourse analysis: A focus on communicative repertoires. In HornbergerN.McKayS. (Eds.), Sociolinguistics and language education (pp. 528–546). Multilingual Matters.
77.
SabolT.PiantaR.C. (2012). Recent trends in research on teacher–child relationships. Attachment and Human Development, 14, 213–231.
78.
SadoughiaM.HejazibS.Y. (2021). Teacher support and academic engagement among EFL learners: The role of positive academic emotions. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 70, 101060.
79.
SayerP. (2018). Does English really open doors? Social class and English teaching in public primary schools in Mexico. System, 73, 58–70.
80.
ScalesP.C.Van BoekelM.PekelK.SyvertsenA.K.RoehlkepartainE.C. (2020). Effects of developmental relationships with teachers on middle-school students’ motivation and performance. Psychology in the Schools, 57, 646–677.
81.
SethiJ.ScalesP.C. (2020). Developmental relationships and school success: How teachers, parents, and friends affect educational outcomes and what actions students say matter most. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 63, 101904.
82.
ShinH.W.SoY. (2018). The moderating role of socioeconomic status on motivation of adolescents’ foreign language learning strategy use. System, 73, 71–79.
83.
SirinS.R. (2005). Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review of research. Review of Educational Research, 75, 417–453.
84.
TriandisH.C. (2018). Individualism and collectivism. Routledge.
85.
VerschuerenK.KoomenH.M. (2012). Teacher–child relationships from an attachment perspective. Attachment and Human Development, 14, 205–211.
86.
VolodinaA.HepptB.WeinertS. (2021). Effects of socioeconomic status and language use on academic language proficiency in children with a migration background: An evaluation using quantile regressions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 65, 101973.
87.
won KimS. (2019). Is socioeconomic status less predictive of achievement in East Asian countries? A systematic and meta-analytic review. International Journal of Educational Research, 97, 29–42.
88.
XueJ.HuX.YanR.WangH.ChenX.LiM. (2021). Onset age of language acquisition effects in a foreign language context: Evidence from Chinese–English bilingual Children. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 50(2), 239–260.
89.
YangM.LeeH.J. (2022). Do school resources reduce socioeconomic achievement gap? Evidence from PISA 2015. International Journal of Educational Development, 88, 102528.
