Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2025
Challenge-Based Learning as a Catalyst for Global Competence: A Qualitative Study of Student Experiences in Two ENLIGHT Consortium’s Blended Learning Modules
This qualitative study explores students’ perceptions regarding the potential of Challenge-Based Learning (CBL) to foster global competence within higher education, specifically within two blended learning modules offered by the European ENLIGHT consortium. Although widely applied in STEM, CBL’s effectiveness in non-STEM contexts, particularly for intercultural collaboration and societal responsibility, is less understood. Through thematic analysis of eight focus groups with 34 participants, key themes were identified. Results suggest that CBL promotes critical engagement with global issues, supporting the development of essential skills for an interconnected world. However, challenges in the blended format, such as difficulties in early-stage online collaboration, indicate that refining the instructional design could further optimize outcomes. This study contributes to a broader understanding of CBL’s role in global competence education and provides insights for optimizing its application in diverse academic contexts.
AydoganI.TatO. (2025). How justified are the criticisms of bias against the OECD’s global competence framework?International Journal of Educational Development, 114, Article 103258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2025.103258
2.
BinderF. V.NicholsM.ReinehrS.MalucelliA. (2017). Challenge Based Learning Applied to Mobile Software Development Teaching. In 2017 IEEE 30th Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training (CSEE&T), Savannah, GA, USA, 2017, pp. 57-64. https://doi.org/10.1109/CSEET.2017.19
3.
BledsoeC.PilgrimJ. (2015). Challenge-based learning using iPad technology in the middle school. In AnH.AlonS.FuentesD. (Eds.), Tablets in K-12 education: Integrated experiences and implications (pp. 238–261). IGI Global.
4.
Boix MansillaV.JacksonA. W. (2022). Educating for global competence: Preparing our students to engage the world (2nd ed.). Asia Society.
5.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2021). Can I use TA? Should I use TA? Should I not use TA? Comparing reflexive thematic analysis and other pattern-based qualitative analytic approaches. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 21(1), 37–47.
8.
BrundiersK.BarthM.CebrianG.CohenM.DiazL.Doucette-RemingtonS.DrippsW.HabronG.HarreN.JarchowM.LoschK.MichelJ.MochizukiY.RieckmannM.ParnellR.WalkerP.ZintM. (2021). Key competencies in sustainability in higher education: Toward an agreed-upon reference framework. Sustainability Science, 16(1), 13–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-020-00838-2
9.
ByrneD. (2021). A worked example of Braun and Clarke’s approach to reflexive thematic analysis. Quality & Quantity, 56(3), 1391–1412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-021-01182-y
ClarkeV.BraunV. (2013). Teaching thematic analysis: Overcoming challenges and developing strategies for effective learning. The Psychologist, 26(2).
12.
CondeM. Á.García-PeñalvoF. J.Fidalgo-BlancoÁ.Sein-EchaluceM. L. (2017). “Can we apply learning analytics tools in hallenge based learning contexts?”. In Learning and Collaboration Technologies. Technology in Education: 4th International Conference, LCT 2017, Held as Part of HCI International 2017, Vancouver, BC, Canada, July 9–14, 2017, Proceedings, Part II 4 (pp. 242–256). Springer International Publishing.
13.
CorteseA. D. (2003). The critical role of higher education in creating a sustainable future. Planning for Higher Education, 31(3), 15–22.
14.
CostaJ.AlscherP.ThumsK. (2024). Global competences and education for sustainable development. A bibliometric analysis to situate the OECD global competences in the scientific discourse. Zeitschrift Für Erziehungswissenschaft. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11618-024-01220-z
15.
DeardorffD. (2006). The identification and assessment of intercultural competence as a student outcome of inter-nationalization. Journal of Studies in International Education, 10(3), 241–266. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315306287002
16.
DeardorffD. K.Arasaratnam-SmithL. A. (2017). Intercultural competence in higher education: International approaches, assessment and application (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315529257
17.
Díaz MartínezR. J. (2019). Design and implementation of a semester I for mechatronics. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing, 13(4), 1441–1455.
18.
DonaldW. E.FordN. (2023). Fostering social mobility and employability: The case for peer learning. Teaching in Higher Education, 28, 672–678. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2022.2145467
19.
DoulougeriK.van den BeemtA.VermuntJ. D.BotsM.BombaertsG. (2022). Challenge-based learning in engineering education: Toward mapping the landscape and guiding educational practice. In Vilalta-PerdomoE.Membrillo-HernándezJ.Michel-VillarrealR.LakshmiG.Martínez-AcostaM. (Eds.), The Emerald handbook of challenge-based learning (pp. 35–68). Emerald Publishing Limited.
20.
FariziS. F.UmamahN.SoepenoB. (2023). The effect of the challenge-based learning model on critical thinking skills and learning outcomes. Anatolian Journal of Education, 8(1), 191–206.
21.
Félix-HerránL. C.Rendon-NavaA. E.Nieto JalilJ. M. (2019). Challenge-based learning: An I-semester for experiential learning in Mechatronics Engineering. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing, 13, 1367–1383.
22.
GallagherS.SavageT. (2023). Challenge-based learning in higher education: An exploratory literature review. Teaching in Higher Education, 28, 1135–1157. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1863354
23.
GamaK.CastorF.AlessioP.NevesA.AraujoC.FormigaR.Soares-NetoF.OliveiraH. (2019). Combining challenge-based learning and design thinking to teach mobile app development [Conference session]. 2018 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), San Jose, CA, USA, 2018 (pp. 1–5). https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2018.8658447
24.
GaskinsW. B.JohnsonJ.MaltbieC.KukretiA. R. (2015). Changing the learning environment in the College of Engineering and Applied Science using challenge-based learning. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy, 5(1), 33–41.
25.
GradJ. M.van der ZandeI. S. E. (2022). Cultivating global citizenship through higher education: A reflection on the development from civic to global engagement. Education Sciences, 12(11), 766. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12110766
26.
Guo-BrennanL. (2022). Global competence education for all in 21st-century higher education. In Guo-BrennanL.Guo-BrennanM. J. (Eds.), Preparing globally competent professionals and leaders for innovation and sustainability (pp. 125–144). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-4528-0
27.
HavisL. R. (2020). Active learning strategies to enhance global competence in higher education. In BranchJ. M.FoleyR. W. (Eds.), Innovations in active learning for global competence (pp. 45–62). Emerald Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2055-364120200000030011
28.
Hernández-de-MenéndezM.Vallejo GuevaraA.Tudón MartínezJ. C.Hernández AlcántaraD.Morales-MenendezR. (2019). Active learning in engineering education. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing, 13(3), 909–922. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-019-00557-8
29.
HockingsC.ThomasL.OttawayJ.JonesR. (2018). Independent learning: What we do when you’re not there. Teaching in Higher Education, 23(2), 145–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2017.1332031
30.
HunterB.WhiteG. P.GodbeyG. C. (2006). What does it mean to be globally competent?Journal of Studies in International Education, 10, 267–285. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315306286930
31.
JiaxinG.HuijuanZ.Md HasanH. (2024). Global competence in higher education: A ten-year systematic literature review. Frontiers in Education, 9, Article 1404782. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1404782
32.
JohnsonL.AdamsS. (2011). Challenge based learning: The report from the implementation project. The New Media Consortium.
33.
JohnsonL. F.SmithR. S.SmytheJ. T.VaronR. K. (2009). Challenge-based learning: An approach for our time. The New Media Consortium.
34.
KirschnerP. A.van MerriënboerJ. J. G. (2013). Do learners really know best? Urban legends in education. Educational Psychologist, 48(3), 169–183.
35.
KolmA.de NooijerJ.VanherleK.WerkmanA.Wewerka-KreimelD.Rachman-ElbaumS.van MerriënboerJ. J. G. (2022). International online collaboration competencies in higher education students: A systematic review. Journal of Studies in International Education, 26(2), 183–201. https://doi.org/10.1177/10283153211016272
36.
KruegerR. A.CaseyM. A. (2015). Focus group interviewing. Handbook of Practical Program Evaluation, 506–534.
37.
LeijonM.GudmundssonP.ChristerssonC. (2022). Challenge-based learning in higher education: A systematic literature review. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 59, 609–618. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2021.1892503
38.
MaleS. A.BushM. B.ChapmanE. S. (2011). An Australian study of generic competencies required by engineers. European Journal of Engineering Education, 36(2), 151–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2011.569703
39.
MalmqvistJ.RådbergK. K.LundqvistU. (2015). Comparative analysis of challenge-based learning experiences [Conference session]. In Proceedings of the 11th International CDIO Conference, Chengdu University of Information Technology, Chengdu, Sichuan, PR China (Vol. 8, pp. 87–94). Chengdu University of Information Technology.
40.
MartinT.RivaleS. D.DillerK. R. (2007). Comparison of student learning in challenge-based and traditional instruction in biomedical engineering. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 35(8), 1312–1323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-007-9297-7
41.
MayerG.EllingerD.SimonS. (2022). Involving external partners in CBL: Reflections on roles, benefits, and problems. In Vilalta-PerdomoE.Membrillo-HernándezJ.Michel-VillarrealR.LakshmiG.Martínez-AcostaM. (Eds.), The Emerald handbook of challenge-based learning (pp. 325–344). Emerald Publishing Limited.
42.
Membrillo-HernándezJ.Ramírez-CadenaM.deJ.Caballero-ValdésC.Ganem-CorveraR.Bustamante-BelloR.Benjamín-OrdoñezJ. A.Elizalde-SillerH. (2018). Challenge-based learning: The case of sustainable development engineering at the Tecnologico de Monterrey, Mexico City Campus. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy, 8, 137–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73210-7_103
43.
Morales-MenendezR.Cantú OrtizF. J.RamirezN. G.FangmeyerJ.De MenendezA. M. H. (2019, April8–11). Research path that improves student engagement [Conference session]. 10th IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference, EDUCON 2019, Dubai, UAE.
44.
NicholsM.CatorK. (2008). Challenge-based learning: Take action and make a difference, challenge-based learning white paper. Apple.
45.
NicholsM.CatorK.TorresM. (2016). Challenge-based learner user guide. Digital Promise.
46.
NizamiM. Z. I.XueV. W.WongA. W. Y.YuO. Y.YeungC.ChuC. H. (2023). Challenge-based learning in dental education. Dentistry Journal, 11(1), 14.
PistruiD.LayerJ. K.DietrichS. L. (2013). Mapping the behaviors, motives and professional competencies of entrepreneurially minded engineers in theory and practice: An empirical investigation. The Journal of Engineering Entrepreneurship, 4(1), 39–54.
53.
PonsD. (2015). Changing importances of professional practice competencies over an engineering career. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 38, 89–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2015.10.001
54.
PriceL.Michel-VillarrealR.PimanavaH.GeC. (2022). Implementing CBL in HEI curricula: Challenges and opportunities for industry partners. In Vilalta-PerdomoE.Membrillo-HernándezJ.Michel-VillarrealR.LakshmiG.Martínez-AcostaM. (Eds.), The Emerald Handbook of challenge-based learning (pp. 345–361). Emerald Publishing Limited.
55.
ReimersF. (2009). Educating for global competency. In CohenJ.MalinM. (Eds.), International perspectives on the goals of universal basic and secondary education (pp. 183–202). Routledge.
56.
RichterT.KjellgrenB. (2024). Global competence development around the world: A systematic review of practical initiatives in engineering education. Cogent Education, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2396190
57.
RobertsonS. L. (2021). Global competences and 21st century higher education – and why they matter. International Journal of Chinese Education, 10, 221258682110103. https://doi.org/10.1177/22125868211010345
58.
ScroccaroA.RossiA. (2022). Self-directed approach as an opportunity to learn in challenge-based learning (CBL): A CBL experience with cross-disciplinary learners at the University of Trento. In Vilalta-PerdomoE.Membrillo-HernándezJ.Michel-VillarrealR.LakshmiG.Martínez-AcostaM. (Eds.), The Emerald Handbook of challenge-based learning (pp. 151–172). Emerald Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-80117-490-920221010
59.
SukackėV.GuerraA. O. P. D. C.EllingerD.CarlosV.PetronienėS.GaižiūnienėL.BlanchS.Marbà-TalladaA.BroseA. (2022). Towards active evidence-based learning in engineering education: A systematic literature review of PBL, PjBL, and CBL. Sustainability, 14(21), 13955.
60.
TangA. C. Y.ChowM. C. M. (2021). Learning experience of baccalaureate nursing students with challenge-based learning in Hong Kong: A descriptive qualitative study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(12), 6293.
61.
Ter BeekM.WopereisI.SchildkampK. (2022). Don’t wait, innovate! Preparing students and lecturers in higher education for the future labor market. Education Sciences, 12(9), 620. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12090620
62.
van den BeemtA.van de WateringG.BotsM. (2023). Conceptualising variety in challenge-based learning in higher education: The CBL-compass. European Journal of Engineering Education, 48, 24–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2022.2078181
63.
Vilalta-PerdomoE.Membrillo-HernándezJ.Michel-VillarrealR.LakshmiG.Martínez-AcostaM. (2022). Introduction – The lay of the land. In Vilalta-PerdomoE.Membrillo-HernándezJ.Michel-VillarrealR.LakshmiG.Martínez-AcostaM. (Eds.), The Emerald handbook of challenge-based learning (pp. 1–11). Emerald Publishing Limited.
64.
VoogtJ.Pareja RoblinN. (2010). 21st century skills. Universiteit Twente.
65.
WiekA.WithycombeL.RedmanC. L. (2011). Key competencies in sustainability: A reference framework for academic program development. Sustainability Science, 6(2), 203–218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-011-0132-6
