While extant studies indicate that ethnic minority citizens report relatively low levels of trust in the police and justice system, it is less clear how that trust can be explained. Thanks to its purposive oversampling of Dutch citizens with Turkish and Moroccan origins and nested structure (individuals clustered within neighbourhoods), the Netherlands Longitudinal Lifecourse Study has enabled us to scrutinise which of the following factors contribute to their trust in the police and justice system: (a) being in a weak socioeconomic position; (b) individual social capital; (c) (perceiving to be) living in underprivileged neighbourhoods characterised by disorder and low social capital; and (d) perceived discrimination. Multilevel structural equation modelling, allowing us to untangle individual perceptions from intersubjective neighbourhood-level conditions, reveals that Moroccan-Dutch citizens report less trust than Turkish-Dutch citizens. We find that perceived neighbourhood disorder and perceived discrimination link to lower trust, while traditional explanations such as socioeconomic position and social capital are far less relevant. We discuss our findings’ implications for ongoing debates on, amongst others, the role of ethnicity and neighbourhood conditions in trust in the police and justice system.
AlalehtoTLarssonD (2016) Measuring trust in the police by contextual and individual factors. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice46: 31–42.
2.
AndreescuVKeelingDG (2012) Explaining the public distrust of police in the newest European Union countries. International Journal of Police Science and Management14(3): 219–245.
3.
AntonopoulosGA (2003) Ethnic and racial minorities and the police: A review of the literature. The Police Journal: Theory, Practice and Principles76(3): 222–245.
4.
AveryEEHermsenJMTowneK (2020) Crime victimization distress, neighbourhood social cohesion and perceived police effectiveness. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology30(6): 581–592.
5.
BiemoltJDoeserAGloriosoAG, et al. (2012) Dienstverleningsconcept Nationale Politie. Den Haag: Nationale Politie.
6.
BoatengFD (2016) Neighborhood-level effects on trust in the police: A multilevel analysis. International Criminal Justice Review26(3): 217–236.
7.
BonnetFCaillaultC (2015) The invader, the enemy within and they-who-must-not-be-named: How police talk about minorities in Italy, The Netherlands and France. Ethnic and Racial Studies38(7): 1185–1201.
8.
BradfordBJacksonJ (2018) Police legitimacy among immigrants in Europe: Institutional frames and group position. European Journal of Criminology15(5): 567–588.
9.
BradfordBJacksonJHoughM, et al. (2018) Trust in Justice. In: UslanerE (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Social and Political Trust. New York: Oxford University Press, 633–654.
10.
BradfordBJacksonJMurphyK, et al. (2022) The space between: Trustworthiness and trust in the police among three immigrant groups Australia. Journal of Trust Research12(2): 125–152.
11.
BradfordBSargeantEMurphyK, et al. (2017) A leap of faith? Trust in the police among immigrants in England and Wales. British Journal of Criminology57(2): 381–401.
12.
BradfordBToppingJMartinR, et al. (2019) Can diversity promote trust? Neighbourhood context and trust in the police in Northern Ireland. Policing and Society29(9): 1022–1041.
13.
BrandlSGFrankJWordenRE, et al. (1994) Global and specific attitudes toward the police: Disentangling the relationship. Justice Quarterly11(1): 119–134.
14.
BrownBBenedictWR (2002) Perceptions of the police: Past findings, methodological issues, conceptual issues and policy implications. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management25(3): 543–580.
15.
CaoLFrankJCullenFT (1996) Race, community context and confidence in the police. American Journal of Police15(1): 3–22.
16.
CaoLWuY (2019) Confidence in the police by race: Taking stock and charting new directions. Police Practice and Research: An International Journal20(1): 3–17.
CroonMAvan VeldhovenJPM (2007) Predicting group-level outcome variables from variables measured at the individual-level: A latent variable multilevel model. Psychological Methods2(1): 45–57.
19.
CrulMDoomernikJ (2003) The Turkish and Moroccan second generation in The Netherlands: Divergent trends between and polarization within the two groups. International Migration Review37(4): 1039–1064.
20.
DaiMJohnsonRR (2009) Is neighborhood context a confounder? Exploring the effects of citizen race and neighborhood context on satisfaction with the police. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management32(4): 595–612.
21.
De GraafPMKalmijnMKraaykampG, et al. (2010a) Design and content of The Netherlands Longitudinal Lifecourse Study (NELLS). Research Report, 88.
22.
De GraafPMKalmijnMKraaykampG, et al. (2010b) The NEtherlands Longitudinal Lifecourse Study (NELLS Wave 1). Dataset.
23.
De KosterWAchterbergPVan der WaalJ, et al. (2014) Progressiveness and the new right: The electoral relevance of culturally progressive values in The Netherlands. West European Politics37(3): 584–604.
24.
De VroomeTHoogheMMarienS (2013) The origins of generalized and political trust among immigrant minorities and the majority population in The Netherlands. European Sociological Review29(6): 1336–1350.
25.
De VroomeTMartinovicBVerkuytenM (2014) The integration paradox: Level of education and immigrants’ attitudes towards natives and the host society. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology20(2): 166–175.
26.
FerrínMKriesiH (2016) How Europeans view and evaluate democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
27.
GelmanAHillJ (2007) Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28.
GlasIEngbersenGSnelE (2019) Going spatial: Applying egohoods to fear of crime research. British Journal of Criminology59(6): 1411–1431.
29.
GoldsmithA (2005) Police reform and the problem of trust. Theoretical Criminology9(4): 443–470.
30.
HippJR (2007) Block, tract, and levels of aggregation: Neighborhood structure and crime and disorder as a case in point. American Sociological Review72(5): 659–680.
31.
HolbrookTMWeinschenkAC (2020) Are perceptions of local conditions rooted in reality? Evidence from two large-scale local surveys. American Politics Research48(4): 467–474.
32.
IntraviaJStewartEAWarrenPY, et al. (2016) Neighborhood disorder and generalized trust: A multilevel mediation examination of social mechanisms. Journal of Criminal Justice46: 148–158.
33.
JacksonJBradfordB (2009) Crime, policing and social order: On the expressive nature of public confidence in policing. British Journal of Sociology60(3): 493–521.
34.
JacksonJBradfordB (2010) What is trust and confidence in the police?Policing (Bradford, England)4(3): 241–248.
35.
JacksonJBradfordBHoughM, et al. (2011) Developing European indicators of trust in justice. European Journal of Criminology8(4): 267–285.
36.
KääriäinenJT (2007) Trust in the police in 16 European countries. European Journal of Criminology4(4): 409–435.
37.
KwakHMcNeeleyS (2019) Neighbourhood characteristics and confidence in the police in the context of South Korea. Policing and Society29(5): 599–612.
38.
LeeHDBoatengFDMareninO (2015) Trust in and legitimacy of the police among American college students. The Police Journal: Theory, Practice and Principles88(4): 299–314.
39.
MacDonaldJStokesRJ (2006) Race, social capital, and trust in the police. Urban Affairs Review41(3): 358–375.
40.
MadonNSMurphyKSargeantE (2017) Promoting police legitimacy among disengaged minority groups: Does procedural justice matter more?Criminology & Criminal Justice17(5): 624–642.
41.
MarshHWLüdtkeORobitzschA, et al. (2009) Doubly-latent models of school contextual effects: Integrating multilevel and structural equation approaches to control measurement and sampling error. Multivariate Behavioral Research44(6): 764–802.
42.
McNeeleySGrothoffG (2016) A multilevel examination of the relationship between racial tension and attitudes toward the police. American Journal of Criminal Justice41: 383–401.
43.
MotleyROJoeS (2018) Police use of force by ethnicity, sex, and socioeconomic class. Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research9(1): 49–67.
44.
MurphyKBradfordBSargeantE, et al. (2022) Building immigrants’ solidarity with police: Procedural justice, identity and immigrants’ willingness to cooperate with police. The British Journal of Criminology62: 299–319.
45.
NewburnT (2016) Social disadvantage, crime, and punishment. In: HartleyDPlattL (eds) Social Advantage and Disadvantage. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 322–340.
46.
PanditharatneSChantLSibleyCG, et al. (2021) At the intersection of disadvantage: Socioeconomic status heightens ethnic group differences in trust in the police. Race and Justice11(2): 160–182.
47.
PassMDMadonNSMurphyK, et al. (2020) To trust or distrust?: Unpacking ethnic minority immigrants’ trust in police. The British Journal of Criminology60(5): 1320–1341.
48.
PerkinsDDMeeksJWTaylorRB (1992) The physical environment of street blocks and resident perceptions of crime and disorder: Implications for theory and measurement. Journal of Environmental Psychology12: 21–34.
49.
PerkinsM (2016) Modelling public confidence of the police: How perceptions of the police differ between neighborhoods in a city. Police Practice and Research17(2): 113–125.
50.
PiatkowskaSJ (2015) Immigrants’ confidence in police: Do country-level characteristics matter?International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice39(1): 1–30.
51.
PosickCRocqueMMcDevittJ (2013) One size fits all? Assessing racial differences in the measurement of attitudes toward the police. Race and Justice3(3): 190–209.
52.
PreacherKJZyphurMJZhangZ (2010) A general multilevel SEM framework for assessing multilevel mediation. Psychological Methods15(3): 209–233.
53.
PutnamR (1993) The prosperous community: Social capital and public life. The American Prospect4(13): 35–42.
54.
PutnamR (2000) Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon and Schuster.
55.
RaudenbusSWSampsonRJ (1999) Ecometrics: Toward a science of assessing ecological settings, with application to the systematic social observation of neighborhoods. Sociological Methodology29(1): 1–41.
56.
RöderAMühlauP (2011) Discrimination, exclusion and immigrant’s confidence in public institutions in Europe. European Societies13(4): 535–557.
57.
RöderAMühlauP (2012) What determines the trust of immigrants in criminal justice institutions in Europe?European Journal of Criminology9(4): 370–387.
58.
RossCEMirowskyJ (1999) Disorder and decay: The concept and measurement of perceived neighborhood disorder. Urban Affairs Review34(3): 412–432.
59.
SampsonRJRaudenbushSW (2004) Neighborhood seeing disorder: Stigma and the social construction of “broken windows”. Social Psychology Quarterly67(4): 319–342.
60.
SampsonRJRaudenbushSWEarlsF (1997) Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science277: 918–924.
61.
SargeantEMazerolleLWickesR (2016) Trust in police and the neighbourhood context: A study of policing in Melbourne. Police Science1(2): 10–16.
62.
SchaapD (2021) Police trust-building strategies. A socio-institutional, comparative approach. Policing and Society31(3): 304–320.
63.
SchuckAMRosenbaumDPHawkinsDF (2008) The influence of race/ethnicity, social class, and neighborhood context on residents’ attitudes toward the police. Police Quarterly11(4): 496–519.
64.
SenU (2010) Social capital and trust: The relationship between social capital factors and trust in the police in the United States (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The University of Texas at Dallas.
65.
SindallKSturgisPJenningsW (2012) Public confidence in the police. A time-series analysis. British Journal of Criminology52: 744–764.
66.
TaylorRBLawtonBA (2012) An integrated contextual model of confidence in local police. Police Quarterly15(4): 414–445.
67.
TolsmaJLubbersMGijsbertsM (2012) Education and cultural integration among ethnic minorities and natives in The Netherlands: A test of the integration paradox. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies38(5): 793–813.
68.
UslanerEM (2002) The Moral Foundations of Trust. New York: Cambridge University Press.
69.
VancluysenKVan CraenMAckaertJ (2011) The perception of neighborhood disorder in Flemish Belgium: Differences between ethnic majority and minority group members and bearing on fear of crime. Journal of Community Psychology39(1): 31–50.
70.
Van CraenM (2012) Determinants of ethnic minority confidence in the police. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies38(7): 1029–1047.
71.
Van CraenM (2013) Explaining majority and minority trust in the police. Justice Quarterly30(6): 1042–1067.
72.
Van CraenMSkoganWG (2015) Differences and similarities in the explanation of ethnic minority groups’ trust in the police. European Journal of Criminology12(3): 300–323.
73.
Van der LeunJPvan der WoudeMAH (2011) Ethnic profiling in The Netherlands? A reflection on expanding preventive powers, ethnic profiling and changing social and political context. Policing and Society21(4): 444–455.
74.
Van der WoudeMAHvan der LeunJPNijlandJ-AA (2014) Crimmigration in The Netherlands. Law & Social Inquiry39(3): 560–579.
75.
Van MeeterenMvan OostendorpL (2019) Are muslims in The Netherlands constructed as a ‘suspect community’? An analysis of Dutch political discourse on terrorism in 2004-2015. Crime, Law and Social Change71(5): 525–540.
76.
Van NoordJDe KosterWVan der WaalJ (2018) Order please! how cultural framing shapes the impact of neighborhood disorder on law-and-order voting. Political Geography64: 73–82.
77.
VerkuytenM (2016) The integration paradox: Empiric evidence from The Netherlands. American Behavioral Scientist60(5-6): 583–596.
78.
WeitzerR (2010) Race and policing in different ecological contexts. In: RiceSKWhiteMD (eds) Race, Ethnicity and Policing: New and Essential Readings. New York: New York University Press, 118–139.
79.
WheelerAPSilverJRWordenRE, et al. (2020) Mapping attitudes toward the police at micro places. Journal of Quantitative Criminology36: 877–906.
80.
WuYSunIYCaoL (2017) Immigrant perceptions of the police: Theoretical explanations. International Journal of Police Science and Management19(3): 171–186.
81.
WuYSunIYTriplettRA (2009) Race, class or neighborhood context: Which matters more in measuring satisfaction with police?Justice Quarterly26(1): 125–156.
82.
ZhangZZyphurMJPreacherKJ (2009) Testing multilevel mediation using hierarchical linear models. Problems and solutions. Organizational Research Methods12(4): 695–719.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
