This study describes a method to measure adoption of person-centered planning, a key element of the emerging supports paradigm. Based on the Levels of Use framework outlined by Hall and his colleagues to measure adoption of an innovation, the six-item Guttman scale yielded a coefficient of reproducibility of ***.90. Initial psychometric testing was based on the responses of 27 employees of an agency that provides services to persons with developmental disabilities. Those scoring highest on this scale were significantly more likely to have attended multiple training sessions on person-centered planning and to report that person-centered planning training has changed how they think about clients. This instrument can assist managers and trainers in determining the extent to which trainees are adopting person-centered planning and can be useful to researchers who wish to explore what variables are related to adoption of person-centered planning.
BaileyD.PalshaS. (1992). Qualities of the stages of concern questionnaire and implications for educational innovations. Journal of Educational Research, 85, 226–232.
2.
BedellJ.WardJ.ArcherR.StokesM. (1985). An empirical evaluation of a model of knowledge utilization. Evaluation Review, 9, 109–126.
3.
BoggsE. M. (1994). Benchmarks of change in the field of developmental disabilities. In BradleyV.AshbaughJ.BlaneyB. (Eds.), Creating individual supports for people with developmental disabilities. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
4.
BradleyV. (1994). Evolution of a new service paradigm. In BradleyV.AshbaughJ.BlaneyB. (Eds.), Creating individual supports for people with developmental disabilities. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
5.
BradleyV.AshbaughJ.BlaneyB. (1994). Creating individual supports for people with developmental disabilities. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
6.
CohenJ. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Orlando: Academic Press.
7.
CohenJ.CohenP. (1983). Applied multiple regression: Correlational analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York: Erlbaum.
8.
CrockerL.AlginaJ. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. Fort Worth, TX: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
9.
DavisH. (1973). Change and innovation. In FeldmanS. (Ed.), The administration of mental health services (pp. 289–341). Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.
10.
DavisH.SalasinS. (1975). The utilization of evaluation. In StruenigE.GuttentagM. (Eds.), Handbook of evaluation research (Vol. I). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
FullanM. (1982). The meaning of educational change. New York: Teachers College Press.
13.
GreasleyP. (1995). Individual planning with adults who have learning difficulties: Key issues-key sources. Disability 8#x38; Society, 10, 353–363.
14.
GuttmanL. (1950). The basis for scalogram analysis. In StoufferS. A. et al., Measurement and prediction. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
15.
HallG. (1979). The concerns-based approach to facilitating change. Educational Horizons, 4, 202–208.
16.
HallG.HordS. (1987). Change in schools: Facilitating the process. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
17.
HauserC. (1979). Evaluating mainstream programs: Capitalizing on AVICTORY. The Journal of Special Education, 13, 107–129.
18.
HaysW. L. (1995). Statistics. Fort Worth: Holt, Rinehart, Winston.
19.
LoucksS. F.NewloveB. F.HallG. E. (1975). Measuring levels of innovation: A manual for trainers, interviewers, and raters. Austin, TX: Research and Development Center for Teacher Education, University of Texas at Austin.
20.
LuckassonR.SpitalnikD. (1994). Political and programmatic shifts of the 1992 AAMR definition of mental retardation. In BradleyV.AshbaughJ.BlaneyB. (Eds.), Creating individual supports for people with developmental disabilities. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
21.
MenzelH. (1953). A new coefficient for scalogram analysis. Public Opinion Quarterly, 17, 268–280.
22.
MountB. A. (1987). Personal futures planning: Finding directions for change (Doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia, 1987). University Microfilms International, Order No. 8724642.
23.
O'BrienJ. (1987). A guide to lifestyle planning. In WilcoxB.BellamyG. T. (Eds.), A comprehensive guide to the activities catalogue: An alternative curriculum for youth and adults with severe disabilities. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
24.
RogersE. (1983). Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press.
25.
SchalockR. (1995). Outcome-based evaluation. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
26.
SmullM. (1987). Systems issues in meeting the mental health needs of persons with mental retardation. In StarkJ.MenolascinoF.AlbarelliM.GrayV. (Eds.), Mental retardation and mental health (pp. 394–398). New York: Springer-Verlag.
27.
TorgersonW. S. (1958). Theory and methods of scaling. New York: John Wiley.
28.
TurnbullA.TurnbullH. R.Blue-BanningM. (1994). Enhancing inclusion of infants and toddlers with disabilities and their families: A theoretical and programmatic analysis. Infants and Young Children, 7, 1–14.
