This article provides a strong endorsement for the utility of the situation awareness (SA) construct in applications and agreement with the identification of fallacies on the construct cited by Endsley. I then highlight three aspects of the construct for discussion: the distinction between SA and decision/choice/action, the distinction between long-term and working memory (related to bandwidth of change), and the importance and challenges of Level 3 SA.
DursoF. T.BleckleyM. K.DattelA. R. (2006). Does SA add to the validity of cognitive tests?Human Factors, 48, 721-733.
2.
DursoF. T.RawsonK. A.GirottoS. (2007). Comprehension and situation awareness. In DursoF. T.NickersonR. S.DumaisS.LewandowskyS.PerfectT. J. (Eds.), Handbook of applied cognition (2nd ed., pp. 163-194). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
3.
EricssonK. A.KintschW. (1995). Long-term working memory. Psychological Review, 102, 211-245.
4.
GargA. X.AdhikariN. K.McDonaldH.Rosas-ArellanoM. P.DevereauxP.BeyeneJ. (2005). Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes. Journal of the American Medical Association, 293, 1223-1238
5.
HoffmanR. R.CrandallB.ShadboltN. (1998). Use of the critical decision method to elicit expert knowledge: A case study in the methodology of cognitive task analysis. Human Factors, 40, 254-276.
6.
KahenmanD. (2011). Thinking fast & slow. New York: Farrar Straus & Giroux.
7.
MaR.KaberD. B. (2007). Situation awareness and driving performance in a simulated navigation task. Ergonomics, 50, 1351-1364.
8.
MorrowD. G.WickensC. D.NorthR. (2006). Reducing and mitigating human error in medicine. Annual Review of Human Factors and Ergonomics, 1, 254-296.
9.
O’BrienK. S.O’HareD. O. (2007). Situational awareness ability and cognitive skills training in a complex real-world task. Ergonomics, 50(7), 1064-1091.
10.
OnnaschL.WickensC.LiH.ManzeyD. (2014). Human performance consequences of stages and levels of automation: An integrated meta-analysis. Human Factors, 56, 476-488.
11.
SulistyawatiK.WickensC. D.ChuiY. P. (2011). Prediction in situation awareness: Confidence bias and underlying cognitive abilities. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 21, 153-174.
12.
TenneyY. J.PewR. W. (2007). Situation awareness catches on. What? So what? What now? In WilligesR. C. (Ed.), Reviews of human factors and ergonomics (Vol. 2, pp. 89-129). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
13.
TetlockP. E. (2005). Expert political judgment: How good is it? How can we know?Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
14.
WickensC. D. (2000). The tradeoff of design for routine and unexpected performance: Implications of situation awareness. In GarlandD. J.EndsleyM. R. (Eds.), Situation awareness analysis and measurement (pp. 211-226). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
15.
WickensC. D. (2002). Situation awareness and workload in aviation. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11(4), 128-133.
16.
WickensC. D. (2008). Situation awareness. Review of Mica Endsley’s articles on situation awareness. Human Factors, 50(Golden Anniversary Special Issue), 397-403.
17.
WickensC. D.CarswellC. M. (2012). Information processing. In SalvendyG. (Ed.), Handbook of human factors and ergonomics (4th ed., pp. 117-161). New York: Wiley.
