Social media engagement—through reactions, comments, and shares—enables the public to interact dynamically with government-disseminated content. This engagement is valuable for real-time communication and for amplifying public awareness of programs, services, and rights. Despite its importance, prior research has overlooked the influence of government communication goals on such engagement. This article addresses that gap by examining objectives such as transparency, reputation management, coproduction, customer service, and citizen participation. Through an analysis of Facebook posts from 62 cities during Hurricane Florence, the article employs negative binomial regression modeling to explore how such goals impact public reactions, comments, and shares. Findings provide insights for aligning social media strategies with public administration objectives to increase engagement across various scenarios.
AtkinsonG. MWaldD. J (2007). "Did you feel it?" Intensity data: A surprisingly good measure of earthquake ground motion. Seismological Research Letters, 78(3), 362–368. https://doi.org/10.1785/gssrl.78.3.362
2.
BaltzA. (2023). What’s so social about Facebook? Distant reading of Swedish local government Facebook pages, 2010-2017. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 17(2), 113–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2022.2144324
3.
BoinA.‘t HartP.SternE.SundeliusB. (2017). The politics of crisis management: Public leadership under pressure (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
4.
BonsónE.PereaD.BednárováM. (2019). Twitter as a tool for citizen engagement: An empirical study of the Andalusian municipalities. Government Information Quarterly, 36(3), 480–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.03.001
5.
BonsónE.RatkaiM. (2013). A set of metrics to assess stakeholder engagement and social legitimacy on a corporate Facebook page. Online Information Review, 37(5), 787–803. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-03-2012-0054
6.
BryerT. A. (2013). Designing social media strategies for effective citizen engagement: A case example and model. National Civic Review, 102(1), 43–50. https://doi.org/10.1002/ncr.21114
CalhanH. S.KarkinN.HasilogluS. B.OzgulM. E. (2021). The reflection of public values in twitter use of metropolitan municipalities: A content analysis employing the analytic hierarchy process. Information Polity, 26(4), 391–415. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-210327
ChenQ.MinC.ZhangW.WangG.MaX.EvansR. (2020). Unpacking the black box: How to promote citizen engagement through government social media during the COVID-19 crisis. Computers in Human Behavior, 110, 106380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106380
11.
ComfortL. K.HaaseT. W. (2006). Communication, coherence, and collective action: The impact of Hurricane Katrina on communications infrastructure. Public Works Management & Policy, 10(4), 328–343. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087724x06289052
12.
CoombsW. T. (2007). Protecting organization reputations during a crisis: The development and application of situational crisis communication theory. Corporate Reputation Review, 10(3), 163–176. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.crr.1550049
13.
CoombsW. T.HolladayS. J. (Eds.). (2023). The handbook of crisis communication (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
14.
CriadoJ. I.VillodreJ. (2021). Delivering public services through social media in European local governments. An interpretative framework using semantic algorithms. Local Government Studies, 47(2), 253–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2020.1729750
15.
DenhardtR. B.DenhardtJ. V. (2000). The new public service: Serving rather than steering. Public Administration Review, 60(6), 549–559. https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-3352.00117
16.
DenhardtJ. V.DenhardtR. B. (2015). The new public service: Serving, not steering. Routledge.
17.
DePaulaN.DincelliE. (2018). Information strategies and affective reactions: How citizens interact with government social media content. First Monday, 23(4). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v23i4.8414
18.
DePaulaN.DincelliE.HarrisonT. M. (2018). Toward a typology of government social media communication: Democratic goals, symbolic acts and self-presentation. Government Information Quarterly, 35(1), 98–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.10.003
19.
FeeneyM. K.PorumbescuG. (2021). The limits of social media for public administration research & practice. Public Administration Review, 81(4), 787–792. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13276
20.
GherheșV.Cernicova-BucaM.FărcașiuM. A. (2023). Public engagement with Romanian government social media accounts during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(3), 2372. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20032372
21.
GoncalvesJ.LiuY.XiaoB.ChaudhryS.HosioS.KostakosV. (2015). Increasing the reach of government social media: A case study in modeling government–citizen interaction on Facebook. Policy & Internet, 7(1), 80–102. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.81
22.
HamidehS. (2020). Opportunities and challenges of public participation in post-disaster recovery planning: Lessons from Galveston, TX. Natural Hazards Review, 21(4), 05020009. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000399
23.
HilbeJ. M. (2011). Negative binomial regression (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
24.
HofstraR.MichelsA.MeijerA. (2023). Online democratic participation during COVID-19. Information Polity, 28, 395–410. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-211540
25.
HuQ.AnS.KapucuN.SellnowT.YukselM.FreihautR.DeyP. K. (2024). Emergency communication networks on Twitter during Hurricane Irma: Information flow, influential actors, and top messages. Disasters, 48(4), e12628. https://doi.org/10.1111/disa.12628
26.
HughesA. L.St. DenisL. A.PalenL.AndersonK. M. (2014). Online public communications by police & fire services during the 2012 Hurricane Sandy. Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2014), New York, NY.
27.
ImranM.OfliF.CarageaD.TorralbaA. (2020). Using AI and social media multimodal content for disaster response and management: Opportunities, challenges, and future directions. Information Processing & Management, 57(5), 102261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2020.102261
28.
JacksonS. J.Foucault WellesB. (2015). Hijacking #MYNYPD: Social media dissent and networked counterpublics. Journal of Communication, 65(6), 932–952. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12185
29.
JiangH.TangX. (2023). Effects of local government social media use on citizen compliance during a crisis: Evidence from the COVID-19 crisis in China. Public Administration, 101(3), 843–864. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12845
30.
KagariseW.ZavattaroS. M. (2017). Social media: How one city opens the evidence black box. Public Administration Review, 77(4), 486–488. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12696
31.
LappasG.TriantafillidouA.DeligiaouriA.KleftodimosA. (2018). Facebook content strategies and citizens’ online engagement: The case of Greek local governments. The Review of Socionetwork Strategies, 12, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12626-018-0017-6
32.
LiuB. F.HorsleyJ. S. (2007). The government communication decision wheel: Toward a public relations model for the public sector. Journal of Public Relations Research, 19(4), 377–393. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627260701402473
33.
LovejoyK.SaxtonG. D. (2012). Information, community, and action: How nonprofit organizations use social media. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17(3), 337–353. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01576.x
34.
MarwickAlice EBoydDanah (2011). I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media & Society, 13(1), 114–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810365313
MeijerA.ThaensM. (2013). Social media strategies: Understanding the differences between North American Police Departments. Government Information Quarterly, 30(4), 343–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2013.05.023
38.
MergelI. (2012). Social media in the public sector: A guide to participation, collaboration, and transparency in the networked world. Jossey-Bass/Wiley.
39.
MergelI. (2013). Social media adoption and resulting tactics in the U.S. federal government. Government Information Quarterly, 30(2), 123–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.12.004
40.
MergelI. (2017). Building holistic evidence for social media impact. Public Administration Review, 77(4), 489–495. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12780
41.
MiletiD. S. (1999). Disasters by design: A reassessment of natural hazards in the United States. Joseph Henry Press.
42.
MossbergerK.WuY.CrawfordJ. (2013). Connecting citizens and local governments? Social media and interactivity in major U.S. cities. Government Information Quarterly, 30(4), 351–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2013.05.016
43.
NabatchiT.LeighningerM. (2015). Public participation for 21st century democracy. Jossey-Bass.
44.
NabatchiT.SancinoA.SiciliaM. (2017). Varieties of participation in public services: The who, when, and what of coproduction. Public Administration Review, 77(5), 766–776. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12765
45.
OlssonE.-K. (2014). Crisis communication in public organisations: Dimensions of crisis communication revisited. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 22(2), 113–125. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5973.12047
46.
OsborneD.GaeblerT. (1992). Reinventing government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. Plume.
47.
PanagiotopoulosP.BarnettJ.BigdeliA. Z.SamsS. (2016). Social media in emergency management: Twitter as a tool for communicating risks to the public. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 111, 86–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.06.010
48.
PiotrowskiS. J. (2007). Governmental transparency: In the path of administrative reform. University of New York Press.
49.
PylesL.SvistovaJ.AhnS.BirklandT. (2018). Citizen participation in disaster recovery projects and programmes in rural communities: A comparison of the Haiti earthquake and Hurricane Katrina. Disasters, 42(3), 498–518. https://doi.org/10.1111/disa.12260
50.
ReddickC. G.ChatfieldA. T.OjoA. (2017). A social media text analytics framework for double-loop learning for citizen-centric public services: A case study of a local government Facebook use. Government Information Quarterly, 34(1), 110–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.11.001
51.
RenshawS. L.MaiS.DuboisE.SuttonJ.ButtsC. T. (2021). Cutting through the noise: Predictors of successful online message retransmission in the first 8 months of the COVID-19 pandemic. Health Security, 19(1), 31–43. https://doi.org/10.1089/hs.2020.0200
52.
SobaciM. Z.KarkinN. (2013). The use of twitter by mayors in Turkey: Tweets for better public services?Government Information Quarterly, 30(4), 417–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2013.05.014
SuttonJ.GibsonB.SpiroE.LeagueC.FitzhughS.ButtsC. (2015). What it takes to get passed on: Message content, style, and structure as predictors of retransmission in the Boston Marathon bombing response. PLoS One, 10(8), e0134452. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0134452
55.
SuttonJ.RenshawS. L.ButtsC. T. (2020). The first 60 days: American public health agencies’ social media strategies in the emerging COVID-19 pandemic. Health Security, 18(6), 454–460. https://doi.org/10.1089/hs.2020.0105
56.
SuttonJ.RenshawS. L.VosS. C.OlsonM. K.PrestleyR.Ben GibsonC.ButtsC. T. (2019). Getting the word out, rain or shine: The impact of message features and hazard context on message passing online. Weather, Climate, and Society, 11(4), 763–776. https://doi.org/10.1175/WCAS-D-19-0021.1
57.
SuttonJ.SpiroE. S.JohnsonB.FitzhughS.GibsonB.ButtsC. T. (2014). Warning Tweets: Serial transmission of messages during the warning phase of a disaster event. Information, Communication & Society, 17(6), 765–787. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2013.862561
58.
TierneyK. J.LindellM. K.PerryR. W. (2001). Facing the unexpected: Disaster preparedness and response in the United States. Joseph Henry Press.
59.
VillodreJ. (2024). A three-model approach to understand social media-mediated transparency in public administrations. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 91(1), 111–129. https://doi.org/10.1177/00208523241261896
60.
WangW.-J.HaaseT. W.YangC.-H. (2020). Warning message elements and retweet counts: An analysis of tweets sent during Hurricane Irma. Natural Hazards Review, 21(1), 04019014. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000351
61.
WaxaC.GwakaL. T. (2021). Social media use for public engagement during the water crisis in Cape Town. Information Polity, 26, 441–458. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-200273
62.
WellsD. D.AllenK. I. I. T.KimberlyA. (2025). How do fire departments engage the public? Evidence from fire department social media accounts in the United States. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/10495142.2025.2480576
63.
WukichC. (2016). Government social media messages across disaster phases. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 24(4), 230–243. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5973.12119
64.
WukichC. (2021). Government social media engagement strategies and public roles. Public Performance & Management Review, 44(1), 187–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2020.1851266
65.
WukichC. (2022). Social media engagement forms in government: A structure-content framework. Government Information Quarterly, 39(2), 101684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101684
66.
WukichC. (2023). Social media data analysis: A focus on the government–citizen dynamic. Natural Hazards Review, 24(4), 04023032. https://doi.org/10.1061/NHREFO.NHENG-1818
67.
ZavattaroS. M. (2013). Cities for sale: Municipalities as public relations and marketing firms. SUNY Press.
68.
ZavattaroS. M.FrenchP. E.MohantyS. D. (2015). A sentiment analysis of U.S. local government tweets: The connection between tone and citizen involvement. Government Information Quarterly, 32(3), 333–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.03.003
69.
ZingaleN. C. (2013). The phenomenology of sharing: Social media networking, asserting, and telling. Journal of Public Affairs, 13(3), 288–297. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.1468
