Assessing citizen engagement and exploring its influencing factors has become imperative to help the government in leveraging social media to improve its public service delivery. This study aims to examine the content characteristics posted by the government on social media and their impact on citizen engagement. Content analysis of 1264 Facebook posts from three Malaysian ministries were employed from May until June 2022 and coded into four content types, three media richness levels, and the percentage of comments replied to by the government. Findings revealed that information provision was the highest posted content type, yet symbolic presentation was the most engaging, across all ministries. On the other hand, moderate media richness, such as images, was the most attached in content and yielded the most engagement compared to low and high media richness. Responsiveness level was also low and had no impact on citizen engagement. This study presents a novel finding of the government's communicative practice on social media. The findings contribute significantly to understanding how citizen engagement is influenced by symbolic presentation content type and moderate media richness, while perceived responsiveness calls for immediate improvements.
Key points for practitioners:
While social media is currently common worldwide, governments in developing countries are still at the informational stage and have not yet fully realised its benefits.
This study contributes to the government's social media strategy and helps to maximise content posting using the right content and media richness.
The government should adopt a balanced mix of content types, instead of over-focusing on one content type, to cater to diverse audience needs by informing, involving, and emotionally engaging citizens.
It also contributes to the government's communication strategy as it provides evidence on the low quality of responsiveness level.
AlamA.MeenarM.BarrazaF.KhalilM. B.KnoppK. (2022). Citizen engagement on local government Facebook pages: Experience from Aotearoa New Zealand. Cities, 123(103584), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.103584
2.
AlamS. L. (2021). Many hands make light work: Towards a framework of digital co-production to co-creation on social platforms. Information Technology & People, 34(3), 1087–1118. https://doi.org/10.1108/itp-05-2019-0231
3.
AlamS. L.GillA. (2020). A social engagement framework for the government ecosystem: Insights from Australian government Facebook pages. Forty-first International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS), India.
4.
Al-AufiA. S.Al-HarthiI.AlHinaiY.Al-SaltiZ.Al-BadiA. (2017). Citizens’ perceptions of government’s participatory use of social media. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 11(2), 174–194. https://doi.org/10.1108/tg-09-2016-0056
5.
ArshadS.KhurramS. (2020). Can government’s presence on social media stimulate citizens’ online political participation? Investigating the influence of transparency, trust, and responsiveness. Government Information Quarterly, 37(101486), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101486
BellucciM.BiagiS.ManettiG. (2019). Dialogic accounting and stakeholder engagement through social media: The case of top-ranked universities. The Review of Higher Education, 42(3), 1145–1184. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2019.0032
8.
BirghanF.RobertH.MeschedeC. (2021). Challenges, barriers, and approaches for providing digital citizen information. A Case Study in North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany. Proceedings of the 54th Hawaii internationnal conference on system sciences.
9.
BonsónE.PereaD.BednárováM. (2019). Twitter as a tool for citizen engagement: An empirical study of the Andalusian municipalities. Government Information Quarterly, 36(3), 480–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.03.001
10.
BonsónE.RatkaiM. (2013). A set of metrics to assess stakeholder engagement and social legitimacy on a corporate Facebook page. Online Information Review, 37(5), 787–803. https://doi.org/10.1108/oir-03-2012-0054
11.
BonsónE.RoyoS.RatkaiM. (2014). Facebook practices in Western European municipalities. Administration & Society, 49(3), 320–347. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399714544945
12.
BonsónE.RoyoS.RatkaiM. (2015). Citizens’ engagement on local governments’ Facebook sites. An empirical analysis: The impact of different media and content types in Western Europe. Government Information Quarterly, 32(1), 52–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2014.11.001
13.
ChatfieldA. T.ReddickC. G. (2018). All hands on deck to tweet # sandy: Networked governance of citizen coproduction in turbulent times. Government Information Quarterly, 35(2), 259–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.09.004
14.
ChenQ.MinC.ZhangW.MaX.EvansR. (2021). Factors driving citizen engagement with government TikTok accounts during the COVID-19 pandemic: Model development and analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23(2), e21463. https://doi.org/10.2196/21463
15.
ChenQ.MinC.ZhangW.WangG.MaX.EvansR. (2020). Unpacking the black box: How to promote citizen engagement through government social media during the COVID-19 crisis. Computers in Human Behaviour, 110(106380), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106380
16.
ContriM.FissiS.GoriE. (2024). Citizen engagement and dialogic accounting through social media: A study of Italian regions. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 37(3), 866–892. https://doi.org/10.1108/aaaj-02-2022-5663
17.
CriadoJ. I.VillodreJ. (2021). Delivering public services through social media in European local governments. An interpretative framework using semantic algorithms. Local Government Studies, 47(2), 253–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2020.1729750
18.
DaftR. L.LengelR. H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32(5), 554–571. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.5.554
19.
DarwishE. B. (2017). The effectiveness of the use of social media in government communication in the UAE. Journal of Arab & Muslim Media Research, 10(1), 41–63. https://doi.org/10.1386/jammr.10.1.41_1
20.
Denktaş-ŞakarG.SürücüE. (2020). Stakeholder engagement via social media: An analysis of third-party logistics companies. The Service Industries Journal, 40(11-12), 866–889. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2018.1561874
21.
DePaulaN.DincelliE. (2016). An empirical analysis of local government social media communication. In Proceedings of the 17th international digital government research conference on digital government research, Shanghai, China.
22.
DePaulaN.DincelliE. (2018). Information strategies and affective reactions: How citizens interact with government social media content. First Monday. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v23i4.8414
23.
DePaulaN.DincelliE.HarrisonT. M. (2018). Toward a typology of government social media communication: Democratic goals, symbolic acts and self-presentation. Government Information Quarterly, 35(1), 98–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.10.003
EomS.-J.HwangH.KimJ. H. (2018). Can social media increase government responsiveness? A case study of Seoul, Korea. Government Information Quarterly, 35(1), 109–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.10.002
26.
FissiS.GoriE.RomoliniA. (2022). Social media government communication and stakeholder engagement in the era of COVID-19: Evidence from Italy. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 35(3), 276–293. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijpsm-06-2021-0145
27.
Gil de ZúñigaH.JungN.ValenzuelaS. (2012). Social media use for news and individuals’ social capital, civic engagement and political participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17(3), 319–336. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01574.x
28.
GuidryJ. P. D.MeganckS. L.LovariA.MessnerM.Medina-MessnerV.ShermanS.AdamsJ. (2020). Tweeting about #Diseases and #Publichealth: Communicating global health issues across nations. Health Communication, 35(9), 1137–1145. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2019.1620089
29.
HaqE.-U.BraudT.LeeL. H.MogaviR. H.ZhangH.HuiP. (2022). Tips, tidings, and tech: Governmental communication on Facebook during the COVID-19 pandemic DG.O 2022: The 23rd annual international conference on digital government research.
30.
Haro-de-RosarioA.Saez-MartinA.Caba-PerezM. d. C. (2018). Using social media to enhance citizen engagement with local government: Twitter or Facebook?New Media & Society, 20(1), 29–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816645652
31.
HasbullahS. S.MaynardD.ChikR. Z. W.MohdF.NoorM. (2016). Automated content analysis. In Proceedings of the 10th international conference on ubiquitous information management and communication, Danang, Vietnam.
HenisaD.WilantikaN. (2021). Content characteristics of government social media and the impact on citizen engagement rate. In 2021 international conference on informatics, multimedia, cyber and information system (ICIMCIS).
34.
HidayatS. E.RafikiA.Al KhalifaM. H. (2019). The social media adoption of public sector in the Kingdom of Bahrain. Journal of Advances in Management Research, 16(1), 23–37. https://doi.org/10.1108/jamr-11-2017-0105
35.
HofmannS.BeverungenD.RäckersM.BeckerJ. (2013). What makes local governments’ online communications successful? Insights from a multi-method analysis of Facebook. Government Information Quarterly, 30(4), 387–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2013.05.013
36.
HussinZ. N.ChinC. P.-Y.SondohS. L.ChooK.-K. R. (2023). How do governments leverage the use of social media? A systematic review. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 71, 7242–7256. https://doi.org/10.1109/tem.2023.3239382
37.
IslamM. A.BhuiyanM. A.-F. (2023). Social media adoption in the public sector of Bangladesh: Progress and efficiency. Information Polity, 28(3), 439–449. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-239011
38.
IslmT.MengH.PitafiA. H.Ullah ZafarA.SheikhZ.Shujaat MubarikM.LiangX. (2021). Why DO citizens engage in government social media accounts during COVID-19 pandemic? A comparative study. Telematics and Informatics, 62(101619), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2021.101619
39.
KarnowskiV.Leinerd. J.KümpelA. S.LeonhardL. (2021). Worth to share? How content characteristics and article competitiveness influence news sharing on social network sites. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 98(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699020940340
40.
KeibK.HimelboimI.HanJ.-Y. (2018). Important tweets matter: Predicting retweets in the #BlackLivesMatter talk on twitter. Computers in Human Behavior, 85, 106–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.03.025
KietzmannJ. H.HermkensK.McCarthyI. P.SilvestreB. S. (2011). Social media? Get serious! Understanding the functional building blocks of social media. Business Horizons, 54(3), 241–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2011.01.005
43.
KimC.YangS.-U. (2017). Like, comment, and share on Facebook: How each behavior differs from the other. Public Relations Review, 43(2), 441–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2017.02.006
44.
KrippendorffK. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (4th ed.). Sage.
45.
LappasG.TriantafillidouA.KaniA. (2022). Harnessing the power of dialogue: Examining the impact of Facebook content on citizens’ engagement. Local Government Studies, 48(1), 87–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2020.1870958
46.
LeeG.KwakY. H. (2012). An Open Government Maturity Model for social media-based public engagement. Government Information Quarterly, 29(4), 492–503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.06.001
47.
LeeJ.XuW. (2018). The more attacks, the more retweets: Trump’s and Clinton’s agenda setting on Twitter. Public Relations Review, 44(2), 201–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2017.10.002
48.
LiY.ChandraY.FanY. (2021). Unpacking government social media messaging strategies during the COVID-19 pandemic in China. Policy & Internet, 14(3), 651–672. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.282
49.
LuoL.DuanS.ShangS.LyuW. (2021). Understanding citizen engagement and concerns about the COVID-19 pandemic in China: A thematic analysis of government social media. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 73(6), 865–884. https://doi.org/10.1108/ajim-11-2020-0377
McKibbenW. B.CadeR.PurgasonL. L.WaheshE. (2022). How to conduct a deductive content analysis in counseling research. Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation, 13(2), 156–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/21501378.2020.1846992
52.
MergelI. (2013a). A framework for interpreting social media interactions in the public sector. Government Information Quarterly, 30(4), 327–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2013.05.015
53.
MergelI. (2013b). Social media adoption and resulting tactics in the U.S. federal government. Government Information Quarterly, 30(2), 123–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.12.004
54.
MetalloC.GesueleB.GuillamónM.-D.RíosA.-M. (2020). Determinants of public engagement on municipal Facebook pages. The Information Society, 36(3), 147–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2020.1737605
55.
NahS.SaxtonG. D. (2013). Modeling the adoption and use of social media by nonprofit organizations. New Media & Society, 15(2), 294–313. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444812452411
56.
NeelyS. R.CollinsM. (2018). Social media and crisis communications: A survey of local governments in Florida. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 15(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1515/jhsem-2016-0067
OnonyeU. H.IgweA. (2017). The utilisation of Facebook for knowledge sharing in selected local government councils in Delta state, Nigeria. Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge, and Management, 12, 269–282. https://doi.org/10.28945/3854
59.
PanagiotopoulosP.BarnettJ.BrooksL. (2013). Social media and government responsiveness: The case of the UK food standards agency. 12th International conference on electronic government (EGOV), Koblenz, Germany.
60.
PaulS.DasS. (2023). Investigating information dissemination and citizen engagement through government social media during the COVID-19 crisis. Online Information Review, 47(2), 316–332. https://doi.org/10.1108/oir-06-2021-0307
61.
RahimA. I. A.IbrahimM. I.FNA. S.AriffinM. A. I. (2019). Health information engagement factors in Malaysia: A content analysis of Facebook use by the ministry of health in 2016 and 2017. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(591), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16040591
62.
ReddickC.ChatfieldA.OjoA. (2017). A social media text analytics framework for double-loop learning for citizen-centric public services: A case study of a local government Facebook use. Government Information Quarterly, 34(1), 110–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.11.001
63.
RenshawS. L.MaiS.DuboisE.SuttonJ.ButtsC. T. (2021). Cutting through the noise: Predictors of successful online message retransmission in the first 8 months of the COVID-19 pandemic. Health Security, 19(1), 31–43. https://doi.org/10.1089/hs.2020.0200
64.
RossB.PotthoffT.MajchrzakT. A.ChakrabortyN. R.LazregM. B.StieglitzS. (2018). The diffusion on crisis-related communication on social media: An empirical analysis of Facebook Reactions. Proceedings of the 51st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
65.
SaldanaJ. (2021). The coding manual for qualitative researches (4th ed.). Sage.
66.
Sandoval-AlmazanR.Valle-CruzD.Sandoval-AlmazanR.KavanaughA.Ignacio CriadoJ. (2021). Social media use in government health agencies: The COVID-19 impact. Information Polity, 26(4), 459–475. https://doi.org/10.3233/ip-210326
67.
SjobergF. M.MellonJ.PeixotoT. (2017). The effect of bureaucratic responsiveness on citizen participation. Public Administration Review, 77(3), 340–351. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12697
68.
StoneJ. A.CanS. H. (2021). Factors influencing tweet purposes and citizen engagement with municipal Twitter accounts. Online Information Review, 45(3), 501–516. https://doi.org/10.1108/oir-05-2020-0175
United Nations, T. (2022). E-Government Survey 2022: The future of digital government.
71.
WatersR. D.WilliamsJ. M. (2011). Squawking, tweeting, cooing, and hooting: Analyzing the communication patterns of government agencies on Twitter. Journal of Public Affairs, 11(4), 353–363. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.385
72.
YangY.DengW.ZhangY.MaoZ. (2021). Promoting public engagement during the COVID-19 crisis: How effective is the Wuhan local government's information release?. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(118), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18010118
73.
ZavattaroS. M.SementelliA. J. (2014). A critical examination of social media adoption in government: Introducing omnipresence. Government Information Quarterly, 31(2), 257–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2013.10.007
74.
ZhangW.YuanH.ZhuC.ChenQ.EvansR. (2022). Does citizen engagement with government social media accounts differ during the different stages of public health crises? An empirical examination of the COVID-19 pandemic. Frontiers in Public Health, 10(807459), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.807459
75.
ZhengL.ZhengT. (2014). Innovation through social media in the public sector: Information and interactions. Government Information Quarterly, 31, S106–S117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2014.01.011
