The purpose of the current study was to determine if there were variations in the self-perceptions of honors and nonhonors collegiate students in areas of academic and nonacademic self-concept. This research was important as it provides emphasis on an understudied population and gathers a deeper understanding of intricacies related to self-concept by incorporating comprehensive investigative measures. A sample of 236 students from a single institution (72.6% female, 65.7% White, 20.8% honors, ages 18–51) took an online survey consisting of questions related to self-concept. By utilizing a series of two-tailed, independent samples t-tests we examined the differences between student self-perceptions of self-concept. Results indicated that honors students had statistically significantly higher academic self-concepts than nonhonors students. Both groups of students scored similarly across social self-concepts; however, nonhonors students had higher perceptions of their physical self-concepts. These findings will provide new insights into how honors enrollment impacts the formation of self-image.
AlegreA.BensonM. J. (2019). Family warmth, self-perception, social competence, and friendships in emerging adulthood. The Educational and Developmental Psychologist, 36(2), 75–81. https://doi.org/10.1017/edp.2019.10
2.
BainS. K.BellS. M. (2004). Social self-concept, social attributions, and peer relationships in fourth, fifth, and sixth graders who are gifted compared to high achievers. Gifted Child Quarterly, 48(3), 167–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620404800302
3.
BaudsonT. G.WeberK. E.FreundP. A. (2016). More than only skin deep: Appearance self-concept predicts most of secondary school students’ self-esteem. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1568. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01568
4.
BowmanN. A.CulverK. C. (2018). When do honors programs make the grade? Conditional effects on college satisfaction, achievement, retention, and graduation. Research in Higher Education, 59(3), 249–272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-017-9466-y
5.
BrigantiG.FriedE. I.LinkowskiP. (2019). Network analysis of contingencies of self-worth scale in 680 university students. Psychiatry Research, 272, 252–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2018.12.080
6.
FischerD. (1996). The new honors programs. US News & World Report, 121(11), 108–110.
7.
GallagherJ. J. (1990). The public and professional perception of the emotional status of gifted children. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 13(3), 202–211. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235329001300302
8.
HarterS. (1985, 2012). The self-perception profile for children: Revision of the perceived competence scale for children. Unpublished manuscript, University of Denver.
9.
HarterS. (1982). Perceived competence scale for child development. Journal of Educational Psychology, 53(1), 87–97. https://doi.org/10.2307/1129640
10.
HogeR. D.RenzulliJ. S. (1993). Exploring the link between giftedness and self-concept. Review of Educational Research, 63(4), 449–465. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543063004449
11.
HoogeveenL.van HellJ. G.VerhoevenL. (2009). Self-concept and social status of accelerated and nonaccelerated students in the first 2 years of secondary school in the Netherlands. Gifted Child Quarterly, 53(1), 50–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986208326556
12.
KilgoC. A.Ezell SheetsJ. K.PascarellaE. T. (2015). The link between high-impact practices and student learning: Some longitudinal evidence. Higher Education, 69, 509–525. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-014-9788-z
13.
KoolA.MainhardM. T.JaarsmaA. D. C.BrekelmansM.van BeukelenP. (2016). Academic success and early career outcomes: Can honors alumni be distinguished from non-honors alumni?High Ability Studies, 27(2), 179–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2016.1238818
14.
KoolA.MainhardT.JaarsmaD.van BeukelenP.BrekelmansM. (2017). Effects of honours programme participation in higher education: A propensity score matching approach. Higher Education Research & Development, 36(6), 1222–1236. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2017.1304362
15.
KoširK.HorvatM.AramU.JurinecN. (2016). Is being gifted always an advantage? Peer relations and self-concept of gifted students. High Ability Studies, 27(2), 129–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2015.1108186
16.
LegetteK. B.Kurtz-CostesB. (2021). Curricular tracking, students’ academic identity, and school belonging. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 41(7), 961–981. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431620977659
17.
LitsterK.RobertsJ. (2011). The self-concepts and perceived competencies of gifted and non-gifted students: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 11(2), 130–140. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-3802.2010.01166.x
18.
McCoachD. B.SiegleD. (2003). The structure and function of academic self-concept in gifted and general education students. Roeper Review, 25(2), 61–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190309554200
19.
MesserB.HarterS. (2012). The self-perception profile for adults: Manual and Questionnaires. The University of Denver, Department of Psychology.
20.
MurisP.MeestersC.FijenP. (2003). The self-perception profile for children: Further evidence for its factor structure, reliability, and validity. Personality and Individual Differences, 35(8), 1791–1802. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(03)00004-7
21.
NeemannJ.HarterS. (1986, 2012). Manual for the self-perception profile for college students. [Unpublished manuscript]. University of Denver.
22.
RinnA. N. (2007). Effects of programmatic selectivity on the academic achievement, academic self-concepts, and aspirations of gifted college students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51(3), 232–245. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986207302718
23.
RinnA. N.CunninghamL. G. (2008). Using self-concept instruments with high-ability college students: Reliability and validity evidence. Gifted Child Quarterly, 52(3), 232–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986208319458
24.
RitchotteJ. A.SuhrD.AlfurayhN. F.GraefeA. K. (2016). An exploration of the psychosocial characteristics of high achieving students and identified gifted students: Implications for practice. Journal of Advanced Academics, 27(1), 23–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X15615316
25.
ShavelsonR. J.HubnerJ. J.StantonG. C. (1976). Self-concept: Validation of construct interpretations. Review of Educational Research, 46(3), 407–441. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543046003407
26.
ShechtmanZ.SilektorA. (2012). Social competencies and difficulties of gifted children compared to nongifted peers. Roeper Review, 34(1), 63–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2012.627555
27.
SongK. Y.AhnJ. D. (2014). A comparative analysis of body composition, physical fitness, and physical self-concept between gifted students in math and science and non-gifted students. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 14(11), 450–466. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2014.14.11.450
28.
WichstraumL. (1995). Harter's self-perception profile for adolescents: Reliability, validity, and evaluation of the question format. Journal of Personality Assessment, 65(1), 100–116. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa6501_8
29.
WirthweinL.BergoldS.PreckelF.SteinmayrR. (2019). Personality and school functioning of intellectually gifted and nongifted adolescents: Self-perceptions and parents’ assessments. Learning and Individual Differences, 73, 16–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2019.04.003
30.
WolfensbergerM. V. (2012). Teaching for excellence: Honors pedagogies revealed. Waxmann Verlag.
