What makes a leadership preparation program exemplary? All three exemplary programs featured in this special issue evidence strong learning orientations and more sustained improvement work in their pursuit of exemplary preparation. I therefore examine exemplary preparation from a process perspective that emphasizes continuous improvement. To help readers make more meaning of the exemplary preparation programs featured in this special issue as well as to advance the field’s understanding of and ability to support and pursue truly exemplary forms of leadership preparation, I examine key improvement technologies, external resources, and internal capacities of importance to continuous program improvement work.
AndersonE.WinnK. M.YoungM. D.GrothC.KorachS.PounderD.RorrerA. K. (2017). Examining university leadership preparation: An analysis of program attributes and practices. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 13, 375-397. doi:10.1177/1942775117735873
2.
BallengerJ.AlfordB.McCuneS.McCuneD. (2009). Obtaining validation from graduates on a restructured principal preparation program. Journal of School Leadership, 19, 533-558.
3.
BottomsG.O’NeillK.FryB.HillD. (2003). Good principals are the key to successful schools: Six strategies to prepare more good principals. Atlanta, GA: Southern Regional Education Board.
4.
BowersA. J.WhiteB. R. (2014). Do principal preparation and teacher qualifications influence different types of school growth trajectories in Illinois? A growth mixture model analysis. Journal of Educational Administration, 52, 705-736.
5.
Browne-FerrignoT. (2011). Mandated university-district partnerships for principal preparation: Professors’ perspectives on required program redesign. Journal of School Leadership, 21, 735-756.
6.
Browne-FerrignoT. (2013). Mandated preparation program redesign: Kentucky case. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 8, 168-190.
7.
CosnerS.TozerS.SmylieM. (2012). The Ed.D. Program at UIC: Using cycles of inquiry and improvement to advance leadership preparation. Planning and Changing, 43(1-2), 127-148.
8.
CosnerS.TozerS.ZavitkovskyP.WhalenS. (2015). Cultivating exemplary school leadership preparation at a research intensive university. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 10, 11-38.
9.
CrowG. M.WhitemanR. S. (2016). Effective preparation program features: A literature review. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 11, 120-148.
10.
Darling-HammondL.LaPointeM.MeyersonD.OrrM. T. (2007). Preparing school leaders for a changing world: Lessons from exemplary leadership development programs: Executive summary. Stanford, CA: Stanford Educational Leadership Institute, Stanford University.
11.
Darling-HammondL.LaPointeM.MeyersonD.OrrM. T.CohenC. (2007). Preparing school leaders for a changing world: Lessons from exemplary leadership development programs: Final report. Stanford, CA: Stanford Educational Leadership Institute, Stanford University.
12.
Darling-HammondL.MeyersonD.LaPointeM.OrrM. T. (2010). Preparing principals for a changing world: Lessons from effective school leadership programs. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
13.
DavisS. H.Darling-HammondL. (2012). Innovative principal preparation programs: What works and how we know. Planning and Changing, 43(1/2), 25-45.
14.
DonmoyerR.Yennie-DonmoyerJ.GallowayF. (2012). The search for connections across principal preparation, principal performance, and student achievement in an exemplary principal preparation program. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 7, 5-43.
15.
DoolittleG. (2013). Seeking clarity in New Jersey for leadership preparation program design: Confusion, fragility, and unintended consequences. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 8, 230-246.
16.
ElmoreR. (2005). Accountable leadership. The Educational Forum, 69, 134-142.
17.
FryB. V.CollinsD.IwanickiE. (2012). Creating and sustaining dynamic university/school district partnerships for the preparation of learning-centered school leaders. In SanzoK.MyranS.NormoreA. H. (Eds.), Successful school leadership preparation and development (pp. 73-96). Bingley, UK: Emerald.
18.
FullerE.YoungM.BakerB. D. (2011). Do principal preparation programs influence student achievement through the building of teacher-team qualifications by the principal? An exploratory analysis. Educational Administration Quarterly, 47, 173-216.
19.
FusarelliB.FusarelliL.DrakeT. (2019). NC State’s principal leadership academies: Context, challenges, and promising practices. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 14(1), 11-30.
20.
FusarelliB.FusarelliL.WirtL. (2018). Developing and sustaining school-university-community collaborative partnerships to develop school leaders in rural areas. In ReardonM.LeonardJ. (Eds.), Innovations and implementation in rural places: School-university-community collaboration in education (pp. 3-28). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
GriffinL. L.TaylorT. R.VarnerL. W.WhiteC. L. (2012). Staying the course: A model leadership preparation program that goes the distance. Planning and Changing, 43(1/2), 57-71.
23.
GuerraF. R.ZamoraR.HernandezR.MenchacaV. (2017). University strategic planning: A process for change in a principal preparation program. International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, 12(1), 1-14.
24.
HermanR.GatesS. M.ArifkhanovaA.BarrettM.BegaA.Chavez-HerreriasE. R. . .WrabelS. L. (2017). School leadership interventions under the Every Student Succeeds Act: Evidence review. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.
25.
HollingworthL.SullivanA. M.CondonC.BhattM.BrandtW. C. (2012). Data-driven decision making in higher education: One university’s process of revamping the superintendent licensure program. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 7, 78-97.
26.
HonigM.DonaldsonE. (2019). Learning to lead the learning of leaders: The evolution of the University of Washington’s Education Doctorate (Ed.D.). Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 14(1), 51-73.
27.
JacobsonS.McCarthyM.PounderD. (2015). What makes a leadership preparation program exemplary?Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 10, 63-76.
28.
KochanF.ReamesE. H. (2013). Experiencing educational leadership preparation program redesign in Alabama: One university’s perspective. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 8, 152-167.
29.
KorachS. (2011). Keeping the fire burning: The evolution of a university-district collaboration to develop leaders for second-order change. Journal of School Leadership, 21, 659-683.
30.
LaheraA. I.NormoreA. H. (2012). Planning, changing, and leading a community of professional practice: Lessons learned from an innovative urban school leaders preparation program in Southern California. In SanzoK.MyranS.NormoreA. H. (Eds.), Successful school leadership preparation and development (pp. 49-72). Bingley, UK: Emerald.
31.
McLaughlinM.TalbertJ. (2006). Building school-based teacher learning communities: Professional strategies to improve student achievement. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
32.
McCarthyM. (2015). Reflections on the evolution of educational leadership preparation programs in the United States and challenges ahead. Journal of Educational Administration, 53(3), 416-438.
33.
MerchantB.GarzaE. (2015). The urban school leaders collaborative: Twelve years of promoting leadership for social justice. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 10, 39-62.
34.
MountfordM.Acker-HocevarM. A. (2013). Florida’s mandated educational leadership program redesign: The William Cecil golden touch. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 8, 212-229.
35.
MullenC. A.EadensD. W. (2018). “Quality leadership matters”: A research-based survey of graduate programming. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 13, 162-200.
36.
National Policy Board for Educational Administration. (2015). Professional standards for educational leaders. Reston, VA: Author.
37.
NiY.HollingworthL.RorrerA.PounderD. (2017). The evaluation of educational leadership preparation programs. In YoungM.CrowG. (Eds.), Handbook of research on the education of school leaders (2nd ed., pp. 285-308). New York, NY: Routledge.
38.
NunneryJ.RossS.ChappellS.PribeshS.Hoag-CarhartE. (2011). The impact of the NISL executive development program on school performance in Massachusetts: Cohort 2 result. Norfolk, VA: Center for Educational Partnerships at Old Dominion University.
39.
OrphanosS.OrrM. T. (2014). Learning leadership matters: The influence of innovative school leadership preparation on teachers’ experiences and outcomes. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 42, 680-700.
40.
OrrM. T. (2006). Mapping innovation in leadership preparation in our nation’s schools of education. Phi Delta Kappan, 87, 492-499.
41.
OrrM. T. (2011). Pipeline to preparation to advancement: Graduates’ experiences in, through, and beyond leadership preparation. Educational Administration Quarterly, 47, 114-172.
42.
OrrM. T.BarberM. E. (2007). Collaborative leadership preparation: A comparative study of innovative programs and practices. Journal of School Leadership, 16, 709-739.
43.
OrrM. T.BarberM. E. (2009). Program evaluation in leadership preparation and related fields. In YoungM. D.CrowG. M.MurphyJ.OgawaR. T. (Eds.), Handbook of research on the education of school leaders (pp. 457-498). New York, NY: Routledge.
44.
OrrM. T.OrphanosS. (2011). How graduate-level preparation influences the effectiveness of school leaders: A comparison of the outcomes of exemplary and conventional leadership preparation programs for principals. Educational Administration Quarterly, 47, 18-70.
45.
PembertonC. L. A.AkkaryR. K. (2010). A cohort is a cohort is a cohort . . . or is it?Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 5, 179-208.
46.
PhillipsJ. C. (2013). Revisioning a school administrator program: A North Carolina case study. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 8, 191-211.
47.
SanzoK. L. (Ed.). (2014). From policy to practice: Sustainable innovations in school leadership preparation and development. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
48.
SanzoK. L.MyranS. (2012). Learning from the evolution of a university-district partnership. In SanzoK.MyranS.NormoreA. H. (Eds.), Successful school leadership preparation and development (pp. 165-182). Bingley, UK: Emerald.
49.
Seashore LouisK.KruseS. (1995). Professionalism and community: Perspectives on reforming urban schools. Thousand Oak, CA: Corwin Press.
50.
ShohoA. R.BarnettB. G.MartinezP. (2012). Enhancing “OJT” internships with interactive coaching. Planning and Changing, 43(1/2), 161-182.
51.
SmylieM. A. (2010). Continuous school improvement. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
52.
SutcherL.PodolskyA.EspinozaD. (2017). Supporting principals’ learning: Key features of effective programs. Palo Alto, CA: Learning Policy Institute.
53.
University Council for Educational Administration. (2012a). Designing purposeful and coherent leadership preparation curriculum: A curriculum mapping guide. Charlottesville, VA: Author.
54.
University Council for Educational Administration. (2012b). Institutional and program quality criteria: Guidance for master’s and doctoral programs in educational leadership. Charlottesville, VA: Author.
55.
University Council for Educational Administration. (2017). Developing evaluation evidence: An evaluation handbook for educational leadership preparation. Charlottesville, VA: Author.
56.
WalkerA.BryantD.LeeM. (2013). International patterns in principal preparation: Commonalities and variations in pre-service programmes. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 41, 405-434.
57.
WoodrumA.BordenA. M.BowerD.OlguinS.PaulL. (2014). Raising the quality of principal leadership development: Lessons from a collaboration between an urban school district, a state leadership institute, and a university leadership program. In SanzoK. (Ed.), From policy to practice: Sustainable innovations in school leadership preparation and development (pp. 47-70). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
58.
YoungM. (2015). Effective leadership preparation: We know what it looks like and what it can do. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 10, 3-10.
