Leadership preparation is essential in developing critical skills of effective school leaders. Educational leadership preparation programs vary greatly in terms of program features, it is important to identify which specific elements are likely associated with program quality. Using multiple years of Initiative for Systemic Program Improvement through Research in Educational Leadership (INSPIRE) data, this study analyzes the relationships between program features and graduates’ assessments of overall program quality. Our main finding is that multiple program features matter in quality preparation, including cohort model, face-to-face course delivery, field-based assessment, and strong district partnerships. Implications for policy and future research are discussed.
American Institutes for Research. (2016). Developing leaders: The importance – and the challenges – of evaluating principal preparation programs. George W. Bush Institute.
2.
ArgyrisC. (1999). On organizational learning (2nd ed.). Blackwell Business.
3.
ArgyrisC.SchonD. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Addison-Wesley.
4.
Browne-FerrignoT.MuthR. (2009). Candidates in educational leadership graduate programs. In YoungM. D.CrowG.MurphyJ.OgawaR. (Eds.), Handbook of research on the education of school leaders (pp. 195–224). Routledge.
5.
BrykA.SebringP.AllensworthE.EastonJ.LuppescuS. (2010). Organizing schools for improvement: Lessons from Chicago. University of Chicago Press.
6.
Byrne-JimenezM.GoodenM.TuckerP. (2017). Facilitating learning in leadership preparation: Limited research but promising practices. In YoungM.CrowG. (Eds.), Handbook of research on the education of school leaders (pp. 173–201). Routledge.
7.
ChoiC.Browne-FerrignoT.MuthR. (2005). An exploration of online peer interaction among preparing school leaders. Educational Leadership and Administration, 17, 101–114.
8.
CrowG.WhitemanR. (2016). Effective preparation program features: A literature review. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 11(1), 120–148.
9.
Darling-HammondL.MeyersonD.LaPointeM.OrrM. T. (2010). Preparing principals for a changing world: Lessons from effective school leadership programs. Jossey-Bass.
10.
DexterS.RichardsonJ.NashJ. (2017). Leadership for technology use, integration, and innovation: A review of the empirical research and implications for leadership preparation. In YoungM. D.CrowG. M. (Eds.), Handbook of research on the education of school leaders (pp. 202–228). Routledge.
11.
DonmoyerR.Yennie-DonmoyerJ.GallowayF. (2012). The search for connections across principal preparation, principal performance, and student achievement in an exemplary principal preparation program. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 7(1), 5–43.
12.
FullerE.ReynoldsA.O’DohertyA. (2017). Recruitment, selection, and placement of educational leadership students. In YoungM.CrowG. (Eds.), Handbook of research on the education of school leaders (pp. 77–117). Routledge.
13.
GarvinD. A. (1993). Building a learning organization. Harvard Business Review, 71(4), 78–91.
14.
GohS. C.ElliottC.QuonT. K. (2012). The relationship between learning capability and organizational performance: A meta-analytic examination. The Learning Organization, 19(2), 92–108.
15.
GreenleeB. J.KaranxhaZ. (2010). A study of group dynamics in educational leadership cohort and non-cohort groups. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 5(11), 357–382.
16.
GrissomJ. A.MitaniH.WooD. S. (2019). Principal preparation programs and principal outcomes. Educational Administration Quarterly, 55(1), 73–115.
17.
GrissomJ.EgaliteA.LindsayC. (2021). How principals affect students and schools. A systematic synthesis of two decades of research. The Wallace Foundation.
18.
GrissomJ.YoungsP. (Eds.). (2016). Improving teacher evaluation systems: Making the most of multiple measures. Teachers College Press.
19.
HackmannD. G.McCarthyM. M. (2013). What constitutes a critical mass? An investigation of faculty staffing patterns in educational leadership programs. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 8, 5–27.
20.
HallingerP.HeckR. H. (1996). Reassessing the principal’s role in school effectiveness: A review of empirical research, 1980–1995. Educational Administration Quarterly, 32(1), 5–44.
21.
HittD. H.TuckerP. D. (2016). Systematic review of key leader practices found to influence student achievement: A unified framework. Review of Educational Research, 86(2), 531–569.
22.
JacobsonS.McCarthyM.PounderD. (2015). What makes a leadership preparation program exemplary?Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 10(1), 63–76.
23.
KochanF.LockeD. (2009). Student assessment in educational leadership preparation programs: Looking at our past, examining our present, and framing our future. In YoungM.CrowG.MurphyJ.OgawaR. (Eds.), Handbook of research on the education of school leaders (pp. 417–456). Routledge.
24.
KofoedM.GebhartL.GilmoreD.MoschitoR. (2021). Zooming to class? Experimental evidence on college students’ online learning during COVID-19 (IZA DP No. 14356). IZA institute of Labor Economics.
25.
KorachS.AgansL. J. (2011). From ground to distance: The impact of advanced technologies on an innovative school leadership program. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 6, 216–233.
26.
LaMagdeleineD.MaxcyB.PounderD.ReedC. (2009). The context of university-based educational leadership preparation. In YoungM. D.CrowG. M.MurphyJ.OgawaR. (Eds.), Handbook of research on the education of school leaders (pp. 129–156). Routledge.
27.
LeithwoodK.HarrisA.HopkinsD. (2020). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership revisited. School Leadership and Management, 40(1), 5–22.
28.
LeithwoodK.Seashore LouisK.AndersonS.WahlstromK. (2004). How leadership influences student learning. The Wallace Foundation.
29.
LevineA. (2005). Educating school leaders (Policy Report No. 1). The Education Schools Project.
30.
McCarthyM. (2015). Reflections on the evolution of educational leadership preparation programs in the United States and challenges ahead. Journal of Educational Administration, 53(3), 416–438.
31.
NiY.HollingworthL.RorrerA.PounderD. (2017). The evaluation of educational leadership preparation programs. In YoungM.CrowG. (Eds.), Handbook of research on the education of school leaders (pp. 285–307). Routledge.
32.
NiY.RorrerA. K.PounderD.YoungM.KorachS. (2019). Leadership matters: Preparation program quality and learning outcomes. Journal of Educational Administration, 57(2), 185–206.
33.
NPBEA. (2015). Professional Standards for Educational Leaders (PSEL). National Policy Board for Educational Administration.
34.
NPBEA. (2018). National Educational Leadership Preparation (NELP) standards. National Policy Board for Educational Administration.
35.
OrrM. T.BarberM. E. (2006). Collaborative leadership preparation: A comparative study of partnership and conventional programs and Practices. Journal of School Leadership, 16, 709–739.
36.
OrrM. T.HollingworthL. (2018). How performance assessment for leaders (PAL) influences preparation program quality and effectiveness. School Leadership and Management, 38(5), 496–517.
37.
PerroneF. (2019). Who is offering university-based principal preparation, to what extent, and where: A focus on the master’s degree and why change matters from 2007 to 2016. In DanzigA.BlackW. (Eds.), Who controls the preparation of education administrators? (pp. 25–51). Information Age Publishing.
38.
PounderD. G. (2011). Leader preparation special issue: Implications for policy, practice, and research. Educational Administration Quarterly, 47(1), 258–267.
39.
Reyes-GuerraD.BarnettB. (2017). Clinical practice in educational leadership. In YoungM.CrowG. (Eds.), Handbook of research on the education of school leaders (pp. 229–261). Routledge.
40.
RitterC.PolnickB.FinkR.OescherJ. (2010). Classroom learning communities in educational leadership: A comparison study of three delivery options. The Internet and Higher Education, 13, 96–100.
41.
SalazarM. J.PazeyB. L.ZembikM. K. (2013). What we’ve learned and how we’ve used it: Learning experiences from the cohort of a high-quality principalship program. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 8(3), 304–329.
42.
ScribnerS. P.CrowG. M. (2012). Employing professional identities: Case study of a high school principal in a reform setting. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 11(3), 243–274.
43.
SebastianJ.AllensworthE. (2012). The influence of principal leadership on classroom instruction and student learning: A study of mediated pathways to learning. Educational Administration Quarterly, 48(4), 626–663.
44.
The Wallace Foundation. (2016). Improving university principal preparation programs: Five themes from the field. The Wallace Foundation.
45.
YlimakiR.HendersonJ. (2017). Curriculum in educational leadership preparation. In YoungM.CrowG. (Eds.), Handbook of research on the education of school leaders (pp. 148–172). Routledge.
46.
YoungM. (2010). From the director: The promise of university-district partnerships. UCEA Review, 51(1), 11–12.
47.
YoungM.CrowG. (2017). Handbook of research on the education of school leaders (2nd ed.). Routledge.
48.
YoungM.CrowG.MurphyJ.OgawaR. (2009). Handbook of research on the education of school leaders (1st ed.). Routledge.
49.
YoungM.OrrM.TuckerP. (2012). Institutional and program quality criteria: Guidance for Master’s and doctoral programs in Educational Leadership. UCEA.
50.
YoungM.WinnK.RorrerA. (2019). Who controls the preparation of educational administrators? We do, if we commit to doing so. In DanzigA.BlackW. (Eds.), Who controls the preparation of education administrators? (pp. 379–402). Information Age Press.
