Abstract
Introduction
Police officers experience both operational and organizational stress throughout their careers (McCreary & Thompson, 2006). Over a 30-year career, it is estimated that officers are exposed to upward of 900 potentially traumatic events (Rudofossi, 2009) during which time the role of a police officer often fluctuates between “social worker” and “street fighter” (Manzella & Papazoglou, 2014). For instance, police officers may need to support victims and survivors of crimes (e.g., child abuse cases, domestic violence situations) as well as arrest violent criminals. Moreover, exposure to multiple operational stressors is cumulative and may be exacerbated by organizational policies, shifts in work environment, or events beyond the officer’s control (Papazoglou, 2013).
Longitudinal studies have shown that police officers are at an elevated risk of developing mental and physical health disorders and even early mortality when compared with their civilian peers (Violanti, 2010). For example, the connection between extreme stress/trauma and health among police has been studied by Violanti and colleagues (2006). More specifically, in their 10-year longitudinal study, Violanti and colleagues found that police offices—compared with civil service workers—had elevated cortisol levels, more depressive symptoms, as well as more post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms. Similarly, other researchers found that officers—compared with civilians—had elevated blood pressure, increased risk for cardiovascular diseases, and higher prevalence of smoking and alcohol consumption (Joseph et al., 2010). Andersen, Wade, Possemato, and Ouimette (2010) have demonstrated that witnessing trauma (i.e., death and combat) increases the risk of operational stress injury (OSI) including PTSD and depression. In turn, OSI significantly increases the incidence and early onset of chronic disease (i.e., circulatory, musculoskeletal, hypertensive, digestive, and nervous system disease), even among young officers (Andersen et al., 2010; Pizarro, Silver, & Prause, 2006; Possemato, Wade, Andersen, & Ouimette, 2010).
Rationale Behind the “Education About Trauma and Health” (ETH) National Survey
Research regarding what police officers currently know (or want to know) about the relationship between trauma exposure and mental and physical health is rare. Given that police training and educational practices differ based on country or territory, studies using standardized surveys to discover police officer’s preferences or openness to learning further information about the relationship between stress and health are not available. The ETH survey was developed to answer the following questions:
The purpose of the ETH survey is to form a foundation upon which ideas for stress reduction and health intervention strategies may be developed for police officers. The survey was created not with a specific country or region in mind; rather, the questions cover the link between trauma and health, and thus, the survey can be tailored to the unique needs of the country or region surveyed. To develop interventions, it is important to first understand what officers already know, what they need to know, preferred methods of learning, and willingness to engage in interventions. The data discussed in this article refer to survey results from Finland.
Method
Participants
Invitations to participate in the ETH survey were sent to all police officers (nationwide) in Finland (
Procedure
In collaboration with the National Police Board in Finland, the ETH questionnaire was translated from English to Finnish. The Finnish police internal network (Webropol) was utilized to collect data and maintain participants’ confidentiality. Officers were sent an email describing the ETH survey with the consent form attached. If the officer agreed to participate, he or she could access the link provided in the email to complete the survey. Officers who did not agree to participate received a “thank you” note and were able to exit the ETH survey page on the Webropol network. Our participants were not asked to identify or report any personal information to maintain confidentiality. The study was approved by the ethics board of the University of Toronto and the National Police Board in Finland.
Measures
The ETH survey questionnaire consisted of 43 questions (see the appendix). Survey items were a combination of dichotomous, Likert-type scales and open-ended questions. The ETH survey also included an evidence-based brief educational about the potential impacts of trauma exposure and severe stress on police officers’ mental and physical health. This paragraph provided officers with a brief literature review about the relationship between stress, trauma, and health. Participants were asked before and after reading the passage to report their knowledge about the stress, trauma, and health relationship and risk of occupationally related mental and physical health conditions. The purpose of the exercise was to examine whether reading a brief psycho-educational text would change to officers’ perspective about their personal risk of developing a mental or physical health issue associated with the adversities of police work. The questions posed before the passage was presented were as follows (see the appendix): “What do you estimate your risk of having a
Results
Demographics
Our sample (
In terms of position status, most of our participants (60.7%) occupied operational positions (investigative duties and fieldwork), and 33.9% held administrative, managerial, or teaching positions. With regard to years of service, most participants (66%) had been working in their current position for the last 9 years or less. In addition, 26.7% of our participants had worked between 10 and 19 years in their current position.
Stress and Trauma Exposure
Police officers experience various degrees of trauma and stress exposure in the police field. One of the questions explored the degree of high stress and critical incident exposure that participants experienced in their current positions (Figure 1). Participants’ exposure to critical incidents (potential traumas) appeared elevated compared with their experience of high stress events (Figure 1).

Amount of time exposed to critical incidents and high stress in the line of duty.
Most of the participants (85.9%) predicted—for themselves—that they would be exposed to a critical incident in the line of duty at some point in the future and (90.7%) endorsed the strong relationship between exposure to critical incidents (i.e., trauma) and mental health conditions. Fewer participants (64.5%) had been formally taught about the connection between critical incidents and mental health, and a portion (35.5%) reported that they had no prior training or introduction to this topic. In terms of operational and non-operational status positions, our chi-square analysis showed that significantly more operational officers than non-operational officers (χ2 = 46.602 > 13.816,
Chi-square analysis showed a significant difference (χ2 = 12.257 > 10.597,
Participants were asked about the physical and emotional demands of policing (Figure 2). More than half of the officers (53.7%) reported low to moderate levels of physical demands in their police work (not at all to very little). The other participants (48.8%) stated elevated levels of physical demands in their work (high to extremely high). The majority of participants (86.9%) experienced their personal police work as being highly (high to extremely high) emotionally demanding, compared with 12.7% of participants who reported low to moderate levels of emotional demands in their police work (not at all to very little). Moreover, chi-square analysis highlighted gender differences (χ2 = 9.823 > 9.488,

Emotional and physical demands of current role.
Examining the differences between operational and non-operational officers showed that significantly more operational officers considered police work to be both physically (χ2 = 27.940 > 14.860,
The majority of police officers found their jobs to be stressful (Figure 3). However, there were no significant differences between the two groups (operational and non-operational) in terms of how stressful they considered police work to be. Significantly more operational officers (χ2 = 133.388 > 18.467,

Degree of stress involved in police work.
Physical and Mental Health
Participants were asked to rate their knowledge about the impact of critical incident exposure in the development of physical health conditions (Figure 4). The majority of participants (56.9%) reported that they had never been taught (no/I cannot say) about the connection between critical incident exposure and

The connection between critical incident exposure and physical conditions.
We examined participants’ estimation of the impact of police work on raising one’s risk of mental or physical health conditions (Figure 5). Most of participants reported a weak connection between police work—in general—and mental and physical health. There were no significant differences between female and male officers or between operational and non-operational officers in estimation of risk for a mental-health-related condition over the years of service. However, significantly more operational officers than non-operational ones (χ2 = 58.701 > 57.342,

Personal risk for a mental or physical health condition related to police work.
Participants were asked to estimate their personal risk of contracting a mental or physical health condition related to police work (0%-100%) before and after reading a brief evidence-based educational passage about known health risks associated with police work. Participants’ estimation of the risk of acquiring mental but not physical health conditions related to police work over the years in service increased after (
Interventions and Treatment Seeking
Participants were presented with a series of traditional and non-traditional post-trauma interventions. The majority of participants were familiar with, and interested in learning more about, peer support, physical exercise, debriefing practices, and meeting with a psychologist (Figures 6 and 7). However, fewer participants were familiar with, or interested in learning about, dance and movement therapy, mindfulness, yoga, or journaling, although over half were interested in learning about relaxation techniques (Figures 8 and 9). With regard to the ways in which participants wanted to learn about post-trauma interventions, most stated through basic training (39.4%) followed by debriefing practices (33.4%), formal peer support (33.3%), and handbooks (31.5%).

Familiarity with traditional therapies following trauma exposure.

Familiarity with non-traditional therapies following trauma exposure.

Interest in learning more about traditional stress management interventions.

Interest in learning more about alternative stress management interventions.
Participants were asked whether they had participated in at least one of the therapeutic interventions listed in the survey. A substantial proportion (40.3%) reported that such activities had never been offered to them but nearly half (46.7%) stated that they would participate in such activities if they were offered. A fewer percentage of participants (18.8%) reported that they would participate in stress management interventions and related education activities only if they encountered a personal health issue.
The majority of participants preferred the option to seek help from a health professional who belonged to the police organization (71%) versus seeking help from a health professional in private practice.
Discussion
Clinical and Training Implications
Stress and trauma exposure
Police officers in this sample were aware of occupational stress and critical incident exposure (operational officers), and quite a few were aware of the impact of this exposure on increasing one’s risk for a mental health condition in the line of duty. Interestingly, more than half of the officers were aware of the connection between occupational stress and physical health conditions (i.e., sleep problems, digestive disease, pain, substance use, and heart disease). Despite officer awareness of the stressors related to their job, only a third of participants had received formal training on the connection between stress and health.
An unexpected finding was that the majority were willing to admit that the job was emotionally demanding, even more so than physical demands. This may constitute a shift in the culture of police from a time when no one admitted that police work was emotionally demanding, which presented a barrier for them in terms of seeking treatment if they needed it (Papazoglou & Andersen, 2014). It is not surprising that significantly more operational officers compared with non-operational officers considered police work to be both as physically as well as emotionally demanding. What is important, however, is that there was no difference between the two groups (operational and non-operational) in how stressful police work was considered to be. These findings show that operational officers may often experience negative emotions (e.g., sadness, grief, agony) due to exposure to loss, trauma, and extreme stress. However, the experience of stress in police work does not seem to be different between operational and non-operational police officers. This last finding indicates the impact of the operational as well as the organizational stress on a police officers’ well-being.
More operational male officers than operational female officers considered police work to be both physically and emotionally demanding. One possible explanation is that male operational officers may be ordered to undertake more demanding tasks (e.g., carry equipment, handcuff a violent criminal) than their female peers. However, this situation may not always be the case because female officers are in the front line facing the same challenges as their “blue brothers.” Another possibility regarding the finding that female officers reported fewer demands may be in line with studies that indicate that female officers may not openly admit that police work is physically and emotionally demanding because they are trying to comply with the traditionally masculine or “macho” values of police culture. Researchers have found that women may under report demands to present themselves as strong enough to be accepted as “real officers” (Franklin, 2005; Leger, 1997). Given previous research regarding females under-reporting demands suggests that our findings should be interpreted carefully, it may be the case that the demands are equal for male and female officers but there are other underlying reasons for females under-reporting demands, and this should be explored further.
Physical and mental health
The majority of participants were familiar with most of the information provided by the educational passage. However, almost one third of our responders seemed to have low to moderate familiarity with the educational passage’s information regarding the connection between occupational stress and mental health, and the connection between occupational stress and physical health. This finding suggests that there is room for improvement in training officers about the links between stress, trauma, and health.
One of our most interesting findings is that the educational passage of the ETH survey significantly changed our responders’ awareness about the impact of police work over time in increasing the risk of mental health outcomes. This finding indicates that officers’ knowledge and awareness about the connection between the challenges of police work and the corresponding mental health risks can be improved through educational presentations.
Interventions and treatment seeking
Participants were generally open in acquiring more knowledge about stress, trauma, and health. However, they reported low degrees of familiarity with evidence-based practices and techniques: Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT), movement therapy, mindfulness, yoga, and journaling. Researchers (see Papazoglou & Andersen, 2014) have suggested the benefits of these techniques in improving officers’ resilience and promoting their health.
Most of our participants—compared with other offered options—stated their willingness to seek help from physical or mental health professionals who work at their own organizations. This finding likely reflects that officers believe that police health professionals are more familiar with the tenets of police culture and responsibilities and are thus better able to train and assist police officers. Results suggest that if police organizations seek to improve the health and performance of their officers, providing officers with organizationally trained and supported health professionals is the best investment of the organization’s resources.
Recommendations
Adapt police training curriculum to include formal education about stress and health
Given the findings that many officers were aware of job and physical health problems (e.g., sleep disorders, digestive issues, heart-related issues) but not formally taught about this connection may indicate some officers have struggled with health-related issues or know peers who have but may not know what to do about these issues or where to seek help. Formal curricula changes that include educating about the connection between mental and physical health (e.g., involving collaborations with health psychologists) are therefore recommended. When information is taught by the organization, better standardization, up to date information, and empirically based evidence can be presented, rather than hoping that officers learn correct information from peer to peer interactions, which is often not the most reliable or accurate information. Considering that operational officers seem to experience more challenges (e.g., critical incidents, demanding situations) than non-operational ones, education about trauma and stress needs to be customized at the level of “street survival.” However, non-operational officers cannot be ignored; hence, stress and trauma education can be tailored in terms of the duties relevant to their work. For example, officers who are assigned to a task force to discover Internet-based child pornography sites are chronically exposed to graphic images. Although these officers are not in the field, exposure to graphic images over time has been shown to impact both physical and mental health (Silver et al., 2013). Thus, educating task force officers about secondary trauma exposure and health and then providing them with ongoing therapeutic resources provided by the organization is recommended.
Train about interventions—Traditional and non-traditional therapies
Providing education about both traditional and non-traditional therapies is recommended given that not every therapy works equally well for each individual. Some individuals respond better to physical exercise and others to CBT. Results of the current study indicate that officers were open to learning about interventions and even trying them out if they were offered by the organization. Given that many officers endorsed peer support as a preferred method of gathering information and treatment, developing a program to deliver health information via peers may be a good investment of organizational resources. One suggestion is to train a task force of peers to “spread” correct (up to date, empirically based) information about stress and health in addition to informing others about treatment and other organizational supports. One could envision naming such a program “peers for prevention,” a resource that utilizes peers for post-trauma information and support as well as information and resources about occupational stress and health.
Interventions to promote resilience and reduce traumatic reactions following stress
Based on the results of this study, it is recommended that the police organization provide organizational support for clinical therapy, post-trauma interventions, and active prevention workshops or peer groups. Our findings are quite positive, indicating that overall, officers are open to learning more about the connection between occupational experiences, stress, and health and would utilize organization-supported resources.
