Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2025-7
Revisiting building height restriction policy in the historic center of Seoul: Exploring performance-based height management using view shadow simulation
This study empirically explores 3D isovists to explore an alternative approach to a 90 m height cap in Seoul’s historic center. We introduced the concept of “view shadow” in the city center to explore potential room for growth: (1) areas hidden by existing buildings and (2) areas visible but not altering the current skyline. The proposed approach integrates the concept of view shadow cast by existing towers to minimize visual impact and preserve iconic and historic views. The simulation findings indicate that a significant portion, approximately 31 sites or 58.5% of the total, can accommodate taller towers than 90 m without compromising the integrity of the historic skyline. The study demonstrates the ability to increase the floor area by 74% and up to 137% from existing conditions to revitalize Seoul’s historic center.
AhlfeldtGMPietrostefaniE (2019) The economic effects of density: a synthesis. Journal of Urban Economics111: 93–107.
2.
ArensEBosselmannP (1989) Wind, sun and temperature: predicting the thermal comfort of people in outdoor spaces. Building and Environment24(4): 315–320. DOI: 10.1016/0360-1323(89)90025-5.
3.
ArensEBallantiDBennettC, et al. (1989) Developing the San Francisco wind ordinance and its guidelines for compliance. Building and Environment24(4): 297–303.
4.
BaerWBaerNPowellW, et al. (2005) Advances in terrain augmented geometric pairing algorithms for operational test. In: ITEA modelling and simulation workshop, Las Cruces, NM, 12–15 Decemeber 2005.
5.
BarrJMizrachBMundraK (2015) Skyscraper height and the business cycle: separating myth from reality. Applied Economics47(2): 148–160.
6.
BattyM (2001) Exploring isovist fields: space and shape in architectural and urban morphology. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design28(1): 123–150.
7.
BenediktML (1979) To take hold of space: isovists and isovist fields. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design6(1): 47–65.
8.
BertaudABruecknerJK (2005) Analyzing building-height restrictions: predicted impacts and welfare costs. Regional Science and Urban Economics35(2): 109–125.
9.
BosselmannPArensEADunkerK, et al. (1990) Sun, wind, and pedestrian comfort: a study of Toronto's Central Area. In: Center for Environmental Design Research. Berkeley, CA: University of California.
10.
ChmielewskiSTompalskiP (2017) Estimating outdoor advertising media visibility with voxel-based approach. Applied Geography87: 1–13.
11.
City of San Francisco (1985) San Francisco general plan: downtown area plan.
DantasRNDuarteGda Mota Silveira NetoR, et al. (2018) Height restrictions and housing prices: a difference-in-discontinuity approach. Economics Letters164: 58–61.
FischlerR (1998) The metropolitan dimension of early zoning: revisiting the 1916 New York City ordinance. Journal of the American Planning Association64(2): 170–188.
19.
Fisher-GewirtzmanD (2012) 3D models as a platform for urban analysis and studies on human perception of space. Usage, Usability, and Utility of 3D City Models–European COST Action TU0801, 01001. Les Ulis, France: EDP Sciences.
20.
GiseopKIMAyoungKIMYoungchulKIM (2019) A new 3D space syntax metric based on 3D isovist capture in urban space using remote sensing technology. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems74: 74–87.
21.
GlaeserEL (2013) A nation of gamblers: real estate speculation and American history. The American Economic Review103(3): 1–42.
KimYHRanaSWiseS (2004) Exploring multiple viewshed analysis using terrain features and optimisation techniques. Computers & Geosciences30(9-10): 1019–1032.
28.
KnowlesRL (1980) The solar envelope. Solar Law Reporter2: 263.
29.
KnowlesRL (2003) The solar envelope: its meaning for energy and buildings. Energy and Buildings35(1): 15–25.
30.
KoolhaasR (1994). Delirious New York: a Retroactive Manifesto for Manhattan. New York, NY: The Monacelli Press, LLC.
31.
KOSTAT (2023) Population and housing census. Statistics Korea.
32.
KufnerJ (2011) Tall Building Policy Making and Implementation in central London: Visual Impacts on Regionally Protected Views from 2000 to 2008. PhD thesis. London, UK: London School of Economics and Political Science.
33.
LavrovLPerovF (2016) The problems of high-rise construction in St. Petersburg. Journal of Architecture and Urbanism40(3): 191–197.
LiuCHRosenthalSSStrangeWC (2018) The vertical city: rent gradients, spatial structure, and agglomeration economies. Journal of Urban Economics106: 101–122.
36.
LiuCHRosenthalSSStrangeWC (2020) Employment density and agglomeration economies in tall buildings. Regional Science and Urban Economics84: 103555.
37.
LonerganCHedleyN (2016) Unpacking isovists: a framework for 3D spatial visibility analysis. Cartography and Geographic Information Science43(2): 87–102.
38.
MorelloERattiC (2009) A digital image of the city: 3D isovists in Lynch's urban analysis. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design36(5): 837–853.
39.
MouratoSMazzantiM (2002) Economic valuation of cultural heritage: evidence and prospects. In: TorreDMarta (eds). Los Angeles: Getty Conservation Institute.
RanaSBattyM (2004) Visualising the Structure of Architectural Open Spaces Based on Shape Analysis. International Journal of Architectural Computing2(1): 123–132.
43.
Seoul Metropolitan Government (2000) Seoul city center management master plan.
44.
Seoul Metropolitan Government (2004) Seoul city center development master plan.
TandyCRV (1967) The isovist method of landscape survey. Methods of landscape analysis10: 9–10.
49.
TavernorR (2007) Visual and cultural sustainability: the impact of tall buildings on London. Landscape and Urban Planning83(1): 2–12.
50.
TavernorRGassnerG (2010) Visual consequences of the plan: managing London’s changing skyline. City, culture and society1(2): 99–108.
51.
WillisC (1995) Form Follows Finance: Skyscrapers and Skylines in New York and Chicago. Princeton, UK: Princeton Architectural Press.
52.
YangPPJPutraSYLiW (2007) Viewsphere: a GIS-based 3D visibility analysis for urban design evaluation. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design34(6): 971–992.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
