Variations in human styles at the governance and project levels are under-explored in project governance literature despite the impact of their compatibility on effective governance. This study develops and validates a model of a specific governor’s style (liberal governmentality) on project performance through differentiated project manager styles (transformational and transactional). Considering the inseparable nature of structural aspects of governance, the centralization of structure is selected to expound their cohesive influence on project performance. Results: show that liberal governmentality differently impacts project performance through both studied project manager leadership styles, while centralization distinctly moderates their relationships on project performance.
AgaD. A.NoorderhavenN.VallejoB. (2016). Transformational leadership and project success: The mediating role of team-building. International Journal of Project Management, 34(5), 806–818.
2.
AguinisH.BeatyJ. C.BoikR. J.PierceC. A. (2013). Best practices in moderated regression analysis. Journal of Business and Psychology, 28(1), 1–21.
3.
AhmedR.MohamadA.B. (2016). Exploring the relationship between multi-dimensional top management support and project success: An international study. Engineering Management Journal, 28(1), 54–67.
4.
AhmedR.MohamadA. B.AhmadM. S. (2016). Effect of multidimensional top management support on project success: an empirical investigation. Quality and Quantity, 50(1), 151–176.
5.
AholaT.RuuskaI.ArttoK.KujalaJ. (2014). What is project governance and what are its origins?International Journal of Project Management, 32(8), 1321–1332.
6.
Al-SharafiA.Al-EmranM.IranmaneshM.Al-QaysiN.IahadN. A.ArpaciI. (2023). Understanding the impact of knowledge management factors on the sustainable use of AI-based chatbots for educational purposes using a hybrid SEM-ANN approach. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(10), 7491–7510.
7.
AnantatmulaV. S. (2010). Project manager leadership role in improving project performance. Engineering Management Journal, 22(1), 13–22.
8.
ArcherM. S. (2010). Morphogenesis versus structuration: On combining structure and action. The British Journal of Sociology, 61 (s1), 225–252.
9.
BadewiA.ShehabE. (2016). The impact of organizational project benefits management governance on ERP project success: Neo-institutional theory perspective. International Journal of Project Management, 34(3), 412–428.
10.
BarberE.WarnJ. (2005). Leadership in project management: From firefighter to firelighter. Management Decision, 43(7/8), 1032–1039.
11.
BaronR. M.KennyD. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182.
BassB. M. (1990). From transactional to transformational leadership: Learning to share the vision. Organizational Dynamics, 18(3), 19–31.
14.
BassB. M.AvolioB. J. (2004). Multifactor leadership questionnaire.Mind Garden.
15.
BerssanetiF. T.CarvalhoM. M. (2015). Identification of variables that impact project success in Brazilian companies. International Journal of Project Management, 33(3), 638–649.
16.
BrownS. L.EisenhardtK. M. (1997). The art of continuous change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), 1–34.
17.
BurchellG. (1991). Peculiar interests: Civil society and governing “the system of natural liberty.” In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect (pp. 119–150). University of Chicago Press.
18.
BurnsT.StalkerG. M. (1961). Mechanistic and organic systems. Classics of Organizational Theory, 10(2), 209–214.
19.
CheahJ.-H.NitzlC.RoldánJ.Cepeda-CarrionG.GuderganS. P. (2021). A primer on the conditional mediation analysis in PLS-SEM. The DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems, 52(4), 43–100.
20.
ChildJ. (1973). Strategies of control and organizational behavior. Administrative Science Quarterly, 18(1), 1–17.
21.
ClarkeN. (2010). Emotional intelligence and its relationship to transformational leadership and key project manager competences. Project Management Journal, 41(2), 5–20.
22.
CleggS.NinanJ. (2023). Unravelling governmentality in project ecologies. Project Leadership and Society, 4, 100099.
23.
CleggS.PitsisT. S.Rura-PolleyT.MarosszekyM. (2002). Governmentality matters: Designing an alliance culture of inter-organizational collaboration for managing projects. Organization Studies, 23(3), 317–337.
24.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum.
25.
CohenJ. (2013). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Routledge.
26.
CreasyT.AnantatmulaV. S. (2013). From every direction: How personality traits and dimensions of project managers can conceptually affect project success. Project Management Journal, 44(6), 36–51.
27.
DavisK. (2014). Different stakeholder groups and their perceptions of project success. International Journal of Project Management, 32(2), 189–201.
28.
DeanM. M. (2010). Governmentality: Power and rule in modern society (2nd ed.). Sage Publications Ltd.
29.
DentM. (2014). Crafting the role of the public sector manager: A study in the governance of performance management. Public Management Review, 16(1), 45–66.
DonaldsonL. (2001). The contingency theory of organizations. Sage.
32.
DrouinN.MüllerR.SankaranS. (2017). The nature of organizational project management through the lens of integration. In DrouinN.MüllerR.SankaranS. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of organizational project management (pp. 9–18) Cambridge University Press.
33.
FiedlerF. E. (1996). Research on leadership selection and training: One view of the future. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(2), 241–250.
34.
FiedlerF. E.ChemersM. M. (1967). A theory of leadership effectiveness. McGraw-Hill.
35.
FornellC.LarckerD. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.
36.
GangQ.XiaonaB.ShulinP. (2016). Effect of transactive memory on software outsourcing project performance moderated by project complexity and team social identity. Management Review, 28(10), 181–192.
37.
GherardiS.NicoliniD. (2002). Learning in a constellation of interconnected practices: Canon or dissonance?Journal of Management Studies, 39(4), 419–436.
38.
HageJ.AikenM. (1969). Routine technology, social structure, and organization goals. Administrative Science Quarterly, 14(3),66–376.
39.
HairJ. F.HairJ. F.Jr.SarstedtM.RingleC. M.GuderganS. P. (2023). Advanced issues in partial least squares structural equation modeling. SAGE.
40.
HairJ. F.HultG. T. M.RingleC. M.SarstedtM. (2016). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
41.
HairJ. F. & SarstedtM. (2019). Factors versus composites: Guidelines for choosing the right structural equation modeling method. Project Management Journal, 50(6), 619–624.
42.
HalimS. B. K.OsmanS. B.Al KaabiM. M.AlghizzawiM.AlrayssiJ. A. A. (2023). The role of governance and leadership in public sector organizations: A case study in the UAE. In AlareeniB.HamdanA.KhamisR.KhouryR. E. (Eds.), Digitalisation: Opportunities and challenges for business. ICBT 2022 (Vol. 621, pp. 301–313). Springer.
43.
HayesA. F. (2015). An index and test of linear moderated mediation. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 50(1), 1–22.
44.
HayesA. F. (2018). Partial, conditional, and moderated moderated mediation: Quantification, inference, and interpretation. Communication Monographs, 85(1), 4–40.
45.
HenselerJ.HubonaG.RayP. A. (2016). Using PLS path modeling in new technology research: Updated guidelines. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 116(1), 2–20.
46.
HuemannM. (2016). Human resource management in the project-oriented organization: Towards a viable system for project personnel. Routledge.
47.
IkaL. A.PintoJ. K. (2022). The “re-meaning” of project success: Updating and recalibrating for a modern project management. International Journal of Project Management, 40(7), 835–848.
48.
ImamH.ZaheerM. K. (2021). Shared leadership and project success: The roles of knowledge sharing, cohesion and trust in the team. International Journal of Project Management, 39(5), 463–473.
49.
JiangW.ZhaoX.ZuoJ. (2021). Confucian principles and performance: A contractors’ leadership model. International Journal of Construction Management, 21(8), 834–844.
50.
JoslinR.MüllerR. (2016). The relationship between project governance and project success. International Journal of Project Management, 34(4), 613–626.
51.
KatzD.KahnR. (2015). The social psychology of organizations. In Organizational behavior 2 (pp. 152–168). Routledge.
52.
KaufmannW.BorryE. L., & DeHart-Davis, L. (2019). More than pathological formalization: Understanding organizational structure and red tape. Public Administration Review, 79(2), 236–245.
53.
KeeganA.TurnerJ. R. (2002). The management of innovation in project-based firms. Long Range Planning, 35(4), 367–388.
54.
KesslerS. R.NixonA. E.NordW. R. (2017). Examining organic and mechanistic structures: Do we know as much as we thought?International Journal of Management Reviews, 19(4), 531–555.
55.
KhanJ.JaafarM.JavedB.MubarakN.SaudagarT. (2020). Does inclusive leadership affect project success?The mediating role of perceived psychological empowerment and psychological safety. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 13(5), 1077–1096.
56.
KimS.ShinM. (2019). Transformational leadership behaviors, the empowering process, and organizational commitment: Investigating the moderating role of organizational structure in Korea. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 30(2), 251–275.
57.
KlineT. J. (2005). Psychological testing: A practical approach to design and evaluation. Sage Publications.
58.
KockN. (2015). Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of e-Collaboration, 11(4), 1–10.
KroesP. C. (2011). Managing IT professional agency in a governmental organization. Government Information Quarterly, 28(4), 511–518.
62.
LatifM. S.WangJ. J.ShahzadM.MursilM. (2024). The impact of social support chatbots on patients’ value co-creation behavior in online health communities: A moderated mediation model. Internet Research, 35(6), 1126–1153.
LeeV. H.HewJ. J.LeongL. Y.TanG. W. H.OoiK. B. (2020). Wearable payment: A deep learning-based dual-stage SEM-ANN analysis. Expert Systems with Applications, 157, 113477.
65.
LiJ.JiangW.ZuoJ. (2018). The effects of trust network among project participants on project performance based on SNA approach: A case study in China. International Journal of Construction Management, 20(8), 837–847.
66.
Liébana-CabanillasF.MarinkovićV.KalinićZ. (2017). A SEM-neural network approach for predicting antecedents of m-commerce acceptance. International Journal of Information Management, 37(2), 14–24.
67.
LiuJ.WangZ.SkitmoreM.YanL. (2019). How contractor behavior affects engineering project value-added performance. Journal of Management in Engineering, 35(4), 04019012.
68.
LuoY.ZhengB.FangY.YinX. (2015). Effects of relationship and contract governance on construction project performance: Review and prospects. Proceedings of the2015International Conference on Construction and Real Estate Management (ICCREM 2015) (Vol. 2, pp. 639–649).
69.
MalikM. Y.WangL.ZhuF. (2024). Understanding variations of governmentality and governance structures at the project level in project-based organizations. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business. 17(4/5), 644–685.
70.
Masa'dehR. E.ObeidatB. Y.TarhiniA. (2016). A Jordanian empirical study of the associations among transformational leadership, transactional leadership, knowledge sharing, job performance, and firm performance: A structural equation modelling approach. Journal of Management Development, 35(5), 681–705.
71.
McGregorD. (1960). The human side of enterprise. McGraw-Hill.
72.
MillerP.RoseN. (2008). Governing the present: Administering economic, social and personal life.Polity.
73.
MiterevM.ManciniM.TurnerR. (2017). Towards a design for the project-based organization. International Journal of Project Management, 35(3), 479–491.
74.
MoradiS.KähkönenK.AaltonenK. (2020). Comparison of research and industry views on project managers’ competencies. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 13(3), 543–572.
MüllerR. (2016). Governance and governmentality in projects. Routledge.
77.
MüllerR. (2022). Governance, governmentality and project performance: The role of sovereignty. International Journal of Information Systems and Project Management, 7(2), 5–17.
MüllerR.JugdevK. (2012). Critical success factors in projects: Pinto, Slevin, and Prescott—The elucidation of project success. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 5(4), 757–775.
80.
MüllerR.MartinsuoM. (2015). The impact of relational norms on information technology project success and its moderation through project governance. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 8(1), 154–176.
81.
MüllerR.SankaranS.DrouinN. (2023). Introduction to the research handbook on the governance of projects. In Research handbook on the governance of projects (pp. 1–6). Edward Elgar Publishing.
82.
MüllerR.TurnerJ. R. (2007). Matching the project manager’s leadership style to project type. International Journal of Project Management, 25(1), 21–32.
83.
MüllerR.TurnerJ. R.AndersenE. S.ShaoJ.KvalnesØ. (2016). Governance and ethics in temporary organizations: The mediating role of corporate governance. Project Management Journal, 47(6), 7–23.
84.
MüllerR.TurnerR. (2010). Leadership competency profiles of successful project managers. International Journal of Project Management, 28(5), 437–448.
85.
MüllerR.ZhaiL.WangA. (2017). Governance and governmentality in projects: Profiles and relationships with success. International Journal of Project Management, 35(3), 378–392.
86.
MüllerR.ZhaiL.WangA.ShaoJ. (2016). A framework for governance of projects: Governmentality, governance structure and projectification. International Journal of Project Management, 34(6), 957–969.
87.
MusawirUlAbd-KarimA.& Mohd-DanuriS. B.SM.. (2020). Project governance and its role in enabling organizational strategy implementation: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Project Management, 38(1), 1–16.
88.
MusawirUlMohd-DanuriA.& Abd-KarimM., S. (2024). Making sense of project governance and its role in strategy implementation: a governance-as-practice perspective. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 17(1), 50–76.
NitzlC.RoldanJ. L.CepedaG. (2016). Mediation analysis in partial least squares path modeling: Helping researchers discuss more sophisticated models. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 116(9), 1849–1864.
91.
NixonP.HarringtonM.ParkerD. (2012). Leadership performance is significant to project success or failure: A critical analysis. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 61(2), 204–216.
92.
OdusamiK.IyagbaR.OmirinM. (2003). The relationship between project leadership, team composition and construction project performance in Nigeria. International Journal of Project Management, 21(7), 519–527.
93.
OhJ.LeeH.ZoH. (2021). The effect of leadership and teamwork on ISD project success. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 61(1), 87–97.
94.
OsipovaE.ErikssonP. E. (2013). Balancing control and flexibility in joint risk management: Lessons learned from two construction projects. International Journal of Project Management, 31(3), 391–399.
95.
PawarB. S.EastmanK. K. (1997). The nature and implications of contextual influences on transformational leadership: A conceptual examination. Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 80–109.
96.
PintoJ. K.SlevinD. P. (2006). Project critical success factors: The project implementation profile. In ClelandD. I.GareisR. (Eds.), Global project management handbook: Planning, organizing and controlling international projects (2nd ed., pp. 13.1–13.11). McGraw-Hill.
97.
PodsakoffP. M.MacKenzieS. B.LeeJ.-Y.PodsakoffN. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.
98.
PodsakoffP. M.OrganD. W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management and Governance, 12(4), 531–544.
99.
PottsK. (2000). The people and technology balance: Getting it right for large projects. Engineering Management Journal, 10(2), 61–64.
100.
PreacherK. J.RuckerD. D.HayesA. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42(1), 185–227.
101.
Project Management Institute (PMI). (2018). Success in disruptive times: Expanding the value delivery landscape to address the high cost of low performance. Pulse of the Profession®. PMI.
102.
RashwanK.GhalyM. (2022). The effect of transformational, transactional and authentic leadership on innovation: The mediating role of organizational culture. Consumer Behavior in Tourism and Hospitality, 17(4), 561–575.
103.
RaziqM. M.BoriniF. M.MalikO. F.AhmadM.ShabazM. (2018). Leadership styles, goal clarity, and project success: Evidence from project-based organizations in Pakistan. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 39(2), 309–323.
104.
RhodesC.PullenA.LeeE. (2009). Playing the field: Performing research into public sector organizational change. Organization Studies, 30(6), 623–641.
105.
RobbinsS.JudgeT. A. (2008). Organizational behavior (13th ed.) Prentice Hall.
106.
RodriguesJ. S.CostaA. R.GestosoC. G. (2014). Project planning and control: Does national culture influence project success?Procedia Technology, 16, 1047–1056.
107.
RotterJ. B. (1954). Social learning and clinical psychology. Prentice Hall.
108.
SarrosJ. C.TanewskiG. A.WinterR. P.SantoraJ. C.DenstenI. L. (2002). Work alienation and organizational leadership. British Journal of Management, 13(4), 285–304.
109.
SarstedtM.RingleC. M.HairJ. F. (2021). Partial least squares structural equation modeling. In Handbook of market research (pp. 587–632). Springer.
110.
SchminkeM.CropanzanoR.RuppD. E. (2002). Organization structure and fairness perceptions: The moderating effects of organizational level. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 89(1), 881–905.
111.
SchwarzA.RizzutoT.Carraher-WolvertonC.RoldánJ. L.Barrera-BarreraR. (2017). Examining the impact and detection of the” urban legend” of common method bias. ACM SIGMIS Database: The DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems, 48(1), 93–119.
112.
ShahzadM.QuY.RehmanS. U.ZafarA. U. (2022). Adoption of green innovation technology to accelerate sustainable development among manufacturing industry. Journal of Innovation and Knowledge, 7(4), 100231.
113.
ShahzadM.QuY.ZafarA. U.RehmanS. U.IslamT. (2020). Exploring the influence of knowledge management process on corporate sustainable performance through green innovation. Journal of Knowledge Management, 24(9), 2079–2106.
114.
ShaoJ. (2018). The moderating effect of program context on the relationship between program managers’ leadership competences and program success. International Journal of Project Management, 36(1), 108–120.
115.
ShmueliG.SarstedtM.HairJ. F.CheahJ. H.TingH.VaithilingamS.RingleC. M. (2019). Predictive model assessment in PLS-SEM: Guidelines for using PLS predict. European Journal of Marketing, 53(11), 2322–2347.
116.
SimardM.AubryM.LabergeD. (2018). The utopia of order versus chaos: A conceptual framework for governance, organizational design and governmentality in projects. International Journal of Project Management, 36(3), 460–473.
117.
SineW. D.MitsuhashiH.KirschD. A. (2006). Revisiting Burns and Stalker: Formal structure and new venture performance in emerging economic sectors. Academy of Management Journal, 49(1), 121–132.
118.
SinesilassieE. G.TabishS. Z. S.JhaK. N. (2017). Critical factors affecting cost performance: A case of Ethiopian public construction projects. International Journal of Construction Management, 18(2), 108–119.
119.
SöderlundJ. (2011). Pluralism in project management: Navigating the crossroads of specialization and fragmentation. International Journal of Management Reviews, 13(2), 153–176.
120.
SohmenV. S. (2013). Leadership and teamwork: Two sides of the same coin. Journal of IT and Economic Development, 4(2), 1–18.
121.
Standish Group. (2018). Chaos report on project failure. Standish Group.
122.
TooE. G.WeaverP. (2014). The management of project management: A conceptual framework for project governance. International Journal of Project Management, 32(8), 1382–1394.
123.
ToorS.OforiG. (2006, October 17–20). An antecedental model of leadership development [Paper presentation]. Joint International Symposium of CIB Working Commissions W55/W65/W86, Construction in the 21st century: Local and global challenges, Rome, Italy.
124.
TurnerJ. R. (2020a). How does governance influence decision making on projects and in project-based organizations?Project Management Journal, 51(6), 670–684.
125.
TurnerJ. R. (2020b). Investigating how governmentality and governance influence decision making on projects. Project Leadership and Society, 1, Article 100003.
126.
TurnerJ. R. (2023). Governance, policy, and politics. In B. L. Pasian & N. L. Williams (Eds.), De Gruyter handbook of responsible project management (pp. 95–116). Walter de Gruyter GmbH.
127.
TurnerJ. R.MüllerR.DulewiczV. (2009). Comparing the leadership styles of functional and project managers. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 2(2), 198–216.
128.
TyssenA. K.WaldA.SpiethP. (2014). The challenge of transactional and transformational leadership in projects. International Journal of Project Management, 32(3), 365–375.
129.
WalterF.BruchH. (2010). Structural impacts on the occurrence and effectiveness of transformational leadership: An empirical study at the organizational level of analysis. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(5), 765–782.
130.
WilliamsP.AshillN. J.NaumannE.JacksonE. (2015). Relationship quality and satisfaction: Customer-perceived success factors for on-time projects. International journal of project management, 33(8), 1836–1850.
131.
WinchG. M.BrunetM.CaoD. (2023). Introduction to the research handbook on complex project organizing. In Research handbook on complex project organizing (pp. 1–10). Edward Elgar Publishing.
132.
WinklerI. (2010). Contemporary leadership theories: Enhancing the understanding of the complexity, subjectivity and dynamic of leadership.Springer Science & Business Media.
133.
WuG.LiuC.ZhaoX.ZuoJ.ZhengJ. (2019). Effects of fairness perceptions on conflicts and project performance in Chinese megaprojects. International Journal of Construction Management, 22(5), 832–848.
134.
XiongY.LiX. (2018). Research on performance evaluation of PPP projects. Modern Industrial Economy and Informationization, 8(13), 17–18.
135.
ZhuF.WangX.WangL.YuM. (2021). Project manager's emotional intelligence and project performance: The mediating role of project commitment. International Journal of Project Management, 39(7), 788–798.
136.
ZwikaelO.SmyrkJ. (2015). Project governance: Balancing control and trust in dealing with risk. International Journal of Project Management, 33(4), 852–862.
