In Rhode Island, out-of-school suspensions were excessively and disproportionately used to penalize low-level infractions. To address this problem, the Rhode Island General Assembly passed legislation, effective May 2012, prohibiting out-of-school suspensions for attendance-specific infractions. Four years later, the Assembly passed additional legislation to curb out-of-school suspensions for disruption-specific infractions. This study examines the impact of these suspension reforms on out-of-school suspension outcomes for treatment infractions and corresponding racial-ethnic disparities. To execute the analyses, the study uses student-level administrative data (AY 2009–2010 to AY 2017–2018) from the Rhode Island Department of Education, along with quasi-experimental estimation. The study finds that only the first reform lowers out-of-school suspension outcomes for attendance-specific infractions and corresponding racial-ethnic disparities.
American Academy of Pediatrics. (2013). Out-of-school suspension and expulsion. Pediatrics, 131, e1000–e1007.
2.
American Civil Liberties Union of Rhode Island. (2015). Blacklisted: 2013-2014 racial bias in school suspensions in Rhode Island in the 2013-2014 school year.
American Psychological Association. (2008). Are zero tolerance policies effective in schools? An evidentiary review and recommendations. American Psychologist, 63, 852–862.
5.
AndersonK. P. (2018). Inequitable compliance: Implementation failure of a statewide student discipline reform. Peabody Journal of Education, 93(2), 244–263.
6.
AndersonK. P. (2020). Academic, attendance, and behavioral outcomes of a suspension reduction policy: Lessons for school leaders and policy makers. Educational Administration Quarterly, 56(3), 435–471.
7.
AndersonK. P.EgaliteA. J.MillsJ. N. (2019). Discipline reform: The impact of a statewide ban on suspensions for truancy. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 24(1), 68–91.
8.
AndersonK. P.RitterG. W. (2017). Disparate use of exclusionary discipline: Evidence on inequities in school discipline from a U.S. state. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 25, 49.
9.
AndersonK. P.RitterG. W.ZamarroG. (2019). Understanding a vicious cycle: The relationship between student discipline and student academic outcomes. Educational Researcher, 48(5), 251–262.
10.
ArciaE. (2006). Achievement and enrollment status of suspended students: Outcomes in a large, multicultural school district. Education and Urban Society, 38, 359–369.
11.
ArmourM. (2013). Ed. white middle school restorative discipline evaluation: Implementation and impact, 2012/2013 Sixth and Seventh Grade. University of Texas, The Institute for Restorative Justice and Restorative Dialogue.
12.
ArmourM. (2016). Ed. white middle school restorative discipline evaluation: Implementation and impact, 2014/2015, Sixth, Seventh, and Eighth Grades. University of Texas, The Institute for Restorative Justice and Restorative Dialogue.
13.
AugustineC. H.EngbergJ.GrimmG. E.LeeE.WangE. L.ChristiansonK.JosephA. A. (2018). Can restorative practices improve school climate and curb suspensions. An evaluation of the impact of restorative practices in a mid-sized urban school district. Rand.
14.
Bacher-HicksA.BillingsS. B.DemingD. J. (2019). The school to prison pipeline: Long-run impacts of school suspensions on adult crime (No. w26257). National Bureau of Economic Research.
15.
BaierV. E.MarchJ. G.SaetrenH. (1986). Implementation and ambiguity. Scandinavian Journal of Management Studies, 2(3–4), 197–212.
16.
BakerM. L. (2008). DPS restorative justice project executive summary 2007–2008. Outcomes, Inc.
17.
Baker-SmithE. C. (2018). Suspensions suspended: Do changes to high school suspension policies change suspension rates?Peabody Journal of Education, 93(2), 190–206.
18.
BalfanzR.ByrnesV.FoxJ. H. (2015). Sent home and put off track: The antecedents, disproportionalities, and consequences of being suspended in the 9th grade. In LosenD. (Ed.), Closing the school discipline gap: Equitable remedies for excessive exclusion (pp. 17–30). Teachers College Press.
19.
BasantR.SenG. (2020). Quota-based affirmative action in higher education: Impact on other backward classes in India. Journal of Development Studies, 56(2), 336–360.
20.
BeckA. N.MuschkinC. G. (2012). The enduring impact of race: Understanding the disparities in student disciplinary infractions and achievement. Sociological Perspectives, 55, 637–662.
21.
BermanP. (1978). The study of macro- and micro-implementation. Public Policy, 26, 157–184.
22.
BosioG.OrigoF. (2020). Who gains from active learning in higher education?Education Economics, 28(3), 311–331.
23.
Cobb-ClarkD. A.KassenboehmerS. C.LeT.McVicarD.ZhangR. (2015). Is there an educational penalty for being suspended from school?Education Economics, 23, 376–395.
24.
CohenD. K.MoffittS. L.GoldinS. (2007). Policy and practice: The dilemma. American Journal of Education, 113(4), 515–548.
25.
CongerR. D. (1976). Social control and social learning models of delinquent behavior: A synthesis. Criminology, 14, 17–39.
26.
CuellarA. E.MarkowitzS. (2015). School suspension and the school-to-prison pipeline. International Review of Law and Economics, 43, 98–106.
27.
Datta GuptaN.DubeyA.SimonsenM. (2018). Rising school attendance in Rural India: An evaluation of the effects of major educational reforms. Education Economics, 26(2), 109–128.
28.
DavisJ. E.JordanW. J. (1994). The effects of school context, structure, and experiences on African American males in middle and high school. The Journal of Negro Education, 63, 570–587.
29.
DeeT. S.JacobB. (2011). The impact of No Child Left Behind on student achievement. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 30, 418–446.
30.
ElliottD.HuizingaD.AgetonS. S. (1985). Explaining delinquency and drug use. SAGE.
31.
FabeloT.ThompsonM. D.PlotkinM.CarmichaelD.MarchbanksM. P.BoothE. A. (2011). Breaking schools’ rules: A statewide study of how school discipline relates to students’ success and juvenile justice involvement. Council of State Governments Justice Center.
32.
FarringtonD. (1980). Truancy, delinquency, the home, and the school. In HersovL.BergI. (Eds.), Out of school: Modern perspectives in truancy and school refusal (pp. 49–63). John Wiley.
33.
FirestoneW. A. (1989). Using reform: Conceptualizing district initiative. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11(2), 151–164.
34.
FrancisD. V. (2012). Sugar and spice and everything nice? Teacher perceptions of Black girls in the classroom. The Review of Black Political Economy, 39(3), 311–320.
35.
GavinT. (1997). Truancy: Not just kids’ stuff anymore. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, 66, 8–14.
36.
GjefsenH. M.GunnesT. (2020). How school accountability affects teacher mobility and teacher sorting. Education Economics, 28(5), 455–473.
37.
GonzálezT. (2012). Keeping kids in schools: Restorative justice, punitive discipline, and the school to prison pipeline. Journal of Law & Education, 41(2), 281–335.
38.
GonzálezT. (2015). Socializing schools: Addressing racial disparities in discipline through restorative justice. In LosenD. J. (Ed.), Closing the school discipline gap: Equitable remedies for excessive exclusion (pp. 151–165). Teachers College Press.
39.
GopalanM.NelsonA. A. (2019). Understanding the racial discipline gap in schools. AERA Open, 5(2), 2332858419844613.
40.
GregoryA.ClawsonK.DavisA.GerewitzJ. (2016). Restorative practices to transform teacher-student relationships and achieve equity in school discipline. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 26(4), 325–353.
41.
GregoryA.SkibaR. J.NogueraP. A. (2010). The achievement gap and the discipline gap: Two sides of the same coin?Educational Researcher, 39(1), 59–68.
HenaultC. (2001). Zero tolerance in schools. Journal of Law and Education, 30, 547–553.
44.
HwangN.DominaT. (2020). Peer disruption and learning: Links between suspensions and the educational achievement of non-suspended students. Education Finance and Policy, 16, 443–463.
45.
JainS.BasseyH.BrownM. A.KalraP. (2014). Restorative justice in Oakland schools: Implementation and impacts, an effective strategy to reduce racially disproportionate discipline, suspensions, and improve academic outcomes. Data in Action.
KinslerJ. (2011). Understanding the Black–White school discipline gap. Economics of Education Review, 30(6), 1370–1383.
48.
KnestingK.SkibaR. J. (2002). Zero tolerance, zero evidence: An analysis of school disciplinary practices. New directions for youth development. Indiana University Education Policy Center.
49.
KrezmienM. P.LeoneP. E.AchillesG. M. (2006). Suspension, race, and disability: Analysis of state-wide practices and reporting. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 14, 217–226.
50.
LacoeJ.SteinbergM. P. (2018). Rolling back zero tolerance: The effect of discipline policy reform on suspension usage and student outcomes. Peabody Journal of Education, 93(2), 207–227.
51.
LacoeJ.SteinbergM. P. (2019). Do suspensions affect student outcomes?Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 41(1), 34–62.
52.
LewisS. (2009). Improving school climate: Findings from schools implementing restorative practices. International Institute for Restorative Practices.
53.
LibermanA.KatzM. (2017). Implementing restorative justice in Rhode Island schools. Urban Institute.
54.
LongJ. S. (1997). Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Advanced quantitative techniques in the social sciences. SAGE.
55.
LongshoreD.ChangE.HsiehS. C.MessinaN. (2004). Self-control and social bonds: A combined control perspective on deviance. Crime & Delinquency, 50(4), 542–564.
56.
MarchbanksM. P. I. I. I.BlakeJ. J.BoothE. A.CarmichaelD.SeibertA. L.FabeloT. (2014). The economic effects of exclusionary discipline on grade retention and high school dropout. In LosenD. (Ed.), Closing the school discipline gap: Equitable remedies for excessive exclusion (pp. 59–74). Teachers College Press.
57.
MatlandR. E. (1995). Synthesizing the implementation literature: The ambiguity-conflict model of policy implementation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 5(2), 145–174.
58.
McCluskeyC. P.BynumT. S.PatchinJ. W. (2004). Reducing chronic absenteeism: An assessment of an early truancy initiative. Crime & Delinquency, 50(2), 214–234.
59.
McColdP. (2008). Evaluation of a restorative milieu: Restorative practices in context. In MillerH. V. (Ed.), Restorative justice: From theory to practice (Sociology of crime, law and deviance) (pp. 99–137). Emerald.
60.
McMorrisB. J.BeckmanK. J.SheaG.BaumgartnerJ.EggertR. C. (2013). Applying restorative justice practices to Minneapolis public schools students recommended for possible expulsion: A pilot program evaluation of the family and youth restorative conference program (Final Report). University of Minnesota.
61.
MirskyL. (2007). Safer saner schools: Transforming school culture with restorative practices. Reclaiming Children and Youth: The Journal of Strength-based Interventions, 16(2), 5–12.
62.
MorrisE. W.PerryB. L. (2016). The punishment gap: School suspension and racial disparities in achievement. Social Problems, 63(1), 68–86.
63.
Nicholson-CrottyS.BirchmeierZ.ValentineD. (2009). Exploring the impact of school discipline on racial disproportion in the juvenile justice system. Social Science Quarterly, 90(4), 1003–1018.
64.
NoltemeyerA. L.WardR. M.McloughlinC. (2015). Relationship between school suspension and student outcomes: A meta-analysis. School Psychology Review, 44, 224–240.
65.
OsherD.PoirierJ.JarjouraR.BrownR.KendzioraK. (2015). Avoid simple solutions and quick fixes: Lessons learned from a comprehensive district-wide approach to improve conditions for learning. In LosenD. J. (Ed.), Closing the school discipline gap: Equitable remedies for excessive exclusion (pp. 192–206). Teachers College Press.
66.
OwensJ.McLanahanS. S. (2019). Unpacking the drivers of racial disparities in school suspension and expulsion. Social Forces, 98(4), 1548–1577.
67.
PerryB. L.MorrisE. W. (2014). Suspending progress collateral consequences of exclusionary punishment in public schools. American Sociological Review, 79, 1067–1087.
68.
Raffaele-MendezL. M. (2003). Predictors of suspension and negative school outcomes: A longitudinal investigation. New Directions for Youth Development, 2003(99), 17–33.
69.
Raffaele-MendezL. M.KnoffH. M.FerronJ. M. (2002). School demographic variables and out-of-school suspension rates: A quantitative and qualitative analysis of a large, ethnically diverse school district. Psychology in the Schools, 39, 259–277.
70.
RauschK. M.SkibaR. J. (2005). The academic cost of discipline: The contribution of school discipline to achievement [Paper Presentation]. Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association.
71.
RitterG. W.AndersonK. P. (2018). Examining disparities in student discipline: Mapping inequities from infractions to consequences. Peabody Journal of Education, 93, 161–173.
72.
RumbergerR. W.LosenD. J. (2016). The high cost of harsh discipline and its disparate impact. The Center for Civil Rights Remedies at the Civil Rights Project/Proyecto Derechos Civile.
73.
SabatierP.MazmanianD. (1979). The conditions of effective implementation: A guide to accomplishing policy objectives. Policy Analysis, 5, 481–504.
74.
SagarH. A.SchofieldJ. W. (1980). Racial and behavioral cues in Black and White children’s perceptions of ambiguously aggressive acts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(4), 590.
75.
SedlakA. J.McPhersonK. (2010). Survey of youth in residential placement: Youth’s needs and services (SYRP Report). Westat.
SkibaR. J. (2010). Zero tolerance and alternative discipline strategies. National Association of School Psychologists Communique, 39(1), 28–30.
78.
SkibaR. J.ArredondoM. I.WilliamsN. T. (2014). More than a metaphor: The contribution of exclusionary discipline to a school-to-prison pipeline. Equity & Excellence in Education, 47(4), 546–564.
79.
SkibaR. J.ChungC. G.TrachokM.BakerT. L.SheyaA.HughesR. L. (2014). Parsing disciplinary disproportionality: Contributions of infraction, student, and school characteristics to out-of-school suspension and expulsion. American Educational Research Journal, 51(4), 640–670.
80.
SkibaR. J.MichaelR. S.NardoA. C.PetersonR. L. (2002). The color of discipline: Sources of racial and gender disproportionality in school punishment. The Urban Review, 34(4), 317–342.
81.
SkibaR. J.RauschM. K. (2004). The relationship between achievement, discipline, and race: An analysis of factors predicting ISTEP scores. Center for Evaluation and Education Policy, Indiana University.
82.
SkibaR. J.ReynoldsC. R.GrahamS.SherasP.ConoleyJ. C.Garcia-VazquezE.EdmistonA. (2006). Are zero tolerance policies effective in the schools? An evidentiary review and recommendations. An official report of the APA. https://www.apa.org/pubs/reports/zero-tolerance.pdf
StearnsE.GlennieE. J. (2006). When and why dropouts leave school. Youth & Society, 38, 29–57.
85.
SteinbergM. P.LacoeJ. (2018). Reforming school discipline: School-level policy implementation and the consequences for suspended students and their peers. American Journal of Education, 125(1), 29–77.
86.
StevensW. D.SartainL.AllensworthE. M.LevensteinR. with GuiltinanS.MaderN.HuynhM. H.PorterS. (2015). Discipline practices in Chicago schools: Trends in the use of suspensions and arrests. University of Chicago Consortium of Chicago School Research.
87.
SumnerM. D.SilvermanC. J.FramptonM. L. (2010). School-based restorative justice as an alternative to zero-tolerance policies: Lessons from West Oakland. School of Law, University of California, Berkeley.
U.S. Department of Education, Office of Civil Rights. (2014). Dear colleague letter on the nondiscriminatory administration of school discipline.
90.
WaldJ.KurlaenderM. (2003). Connected in Seattle? An exploratory study of student perceptions of discipline and attachments to teachers. New Directions for Youth Development, 2003(99), 35–54.
91.
WatsonV. (2014). The Black Sonrise: Oakland Unified School District’s commitment to address and eliminate institutionalized racism (an evaluation report). Office of African American Male Achievement, Oakland Unified School District.
92.
WelshR. O.LittleS. (2018). The school discipline dilemma: A comprehensive review of disparities and alternative approaches. Review of Educational Research, 88(5), 752–794.
93.
WilsonA. C. (2020). Carceral schools and college expectations: Evidence from the National Crime Victimization School Crime Supplement. Job Market Paper.
94.
WolfK. C.KupchikA. (2017). School suspensions and adverse experiences in adulthood. Justice Quarterly, 34(3), 407–430.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
